Editors Pick

Petition in Kerala HC against the appointment of Sr. Advocate MK Damodaran as Legal Advisor of CM [Read Petition]

LiveLaw News Network
18 July 2016 2:46 PM GMT
Petition in Kerala HC against the appointment of Sr. Advocate MK Damodaran as Legal Advisor of CM [Read Petition]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

A Writ Petition has been filed in the High Court of Kerala, challenging the appointment of Senior Advocate Sri. M.K.Damodaran as Legal Advisor to the Chief Minister of Kerala, Sri. Pinarayi Vijayan. The petition has been filed by BJP State President Sri. Kummanam Rajasekharan. The Government had created the post of Legal Advisor, through a special order, to aid and advice the Chief Minister of Kerala. The order also specified that the post would have equal rank and status of Principal Secretary without any remuneration.

In the petition, it has been averred that creation of the separate post of Legal Advisor is inconsistent with the existing norms and procedures. The petitioner contends that there cannot be any parallel post of legal Advisor, when the said duty to aid and advise the Government has been vested specifically in the Advocate General by virtue of relevant provisions of constitution. The petitioner apprehends that by creation of such a post, there would be powers vested in two parallel authorities who may tend to conflict with each other. The Petitioner also contends that there would arise conflict of interests/impropriety when the legal advisor appears for private parties in civil and criminal matters against the state. The petitioner has also alleged various other contentions relating to bias and prejudice in the matter.

According to the Petition “the moot question raised and to be decided in this writ petition is, when there is an Advocate General duly appointed by the Governor as provided under the Constitution to advise the State Government, can the State Government appoint and retain a Legal Advisor to the Chief Minister in addition to the Advocate General and, if so, what would be the official status and protocol position of the said Legal Advisor vis a vis the Advocate General, and whether his advice would override that of the Advocate General, and whether he can appear in cases, civil or criminal, against the interest of the State Government and that of the state or in cases where the Government is involved.

In justification of his principal contention, the petitioner has stated as follows:

 “Article 165 of the Constitution stipulates that there shall be an Advocate General for the state who shall advice the Government in all legal matters. Advocate General being the constitutional authority, constitutional propriety demands that his advice should be treated as final as far as the Chief Minister/ the Government is concerned in all legal matters, barring rare exceptions where the Government is constrained to take the opinion of the Attorney General or the Solicitor General. Therefore the Government is not at all justified in appointing a Legal Advisor to the Chief Minister in addition to the Advocate General, which would result in subverting the constitution.”

The Petitioner has sought the following prayers:

i) issue a Writ of Certiorari or a direction or order quashing the Order of Appointment as arbitrary and illegal;

ii) issue a Writ of Prohibition and injunction restraining the State of Kerala and Chief Minister from treating Sri MK Damodaran as Legal Advisor to the Chief Minister.

iii) issue a declaration that the order is arbitrary, unreasonable and unconstitutional and hence void;

iv) Issue a declaration that Sr. Advocate Damodaran is not entitled to appear for opposite parties in court cases wherein the State Government’s interest is involved and opposing the stand of the Government therein; and

The matter is likely to come for consideration before the court at the earliest.

Image from here.

Next Story