Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

25 Feb 2022 9:10 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.
    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an ""innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.
    During one of the previous hearing, the High Court clarified that the interim order passed by it on February 10, which prohibited wearing of religious dresses by students in classrooms, will apply to both degree colleges and Pre-University (PU) Colleges, where uniform has been prescribed.
    Yesterday, Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat made his rejoinder arguments for Muslim girl students, challenging the action of a government PU college in denying their entry for wearing a hijab (headscarf). Kamat argued that people who want to wear head scarf are denied right to education on the pretext of this GO. "Their right to education which is paramount is being put on back burner. As a state you should facilitate and create an enabling atmosphere."
    Opposing State's submissions on the aspect of Constitutional Morality, Kamat added that Sabarimala and Navtej Johar judgments that were cited by the Advocate General are "pro-choice" judgments. "Constitutional morality is pro-choice. It is a restriction on state power," he said.
    Yesterday, the Court also heard Senior Advocate AM Dar for students of another college who were denied entry. It also heard Senior Advocate Guru Krishnakumar for the Respondents.
    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:18 AM GMT

      CJ : We cannot go on presumptions. Have you tried to collect material that there are people behind the agitation? You have any material

      Jha : One young boy Harsha was killed and I am informed CFI is involved in the brutal murder.

      CJ : Investigation is pending. We cannot presume

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:18 AM GMT

      Jha : An agitation of this magnitude cannot be orchestrated overnight. This cannot be turn out of blue. There are photographs showing the girls were not wearing hijab earlier. Suddenly petitions are filed one after another, senior lawyers across the country are engaged

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:17 AM GMT

      Jha : Which are the organisations, PFI, Campus Front, SIO, Jamaat E Islami which has been funded by Saudi universities to Islamize India. If there is material showing involvement of these organizations, the answer is not difficult to fathom..

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:13 AM GMT

      Jha : When we talk about foreign judgments, Malaysian court judgemet is not applicable.

      CJ : Come to your first prayer. If you want to press that, argue that.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:13 AM GMT

      Jha : We are in India, in Bharatavarsha..

      CJ : Mr.Jha, you have filed this petition for CBI/NIA probe into the agitation? Do you have any material showing extraneous elements, then we can consider. So far as religious issues, we have heard others.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:13 AM GMT

      Jha: Whether it is possible, feasible, what happened 1400 years ago should be applied in 2022. The Answer is NO. What is said..women should lower their gaze..is it possible..when we talk about dogmas it is not possible to literally follow.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:09 AM GMT

      Justice Dixit : This is an exclusively girls school. Where is the point?

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:09 AM GMT

      Jha refers to a Bombay HC judgment on hijab - "there is no established practice of Muslim girl having to wear headscarf while studying in an all girls-schools. It is not obligatory for her to wear heardscarf in an exclusively girls school"

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:05 AM GMT

      Justice Dixit : We are talking about uniforms in school. How these judgments are relevant?

      CJ : You are on the importance on uniform?

      Jha : Yes.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:05 AM GMT

      Jha says the Kerala HC decision was in a case by a lawyer who took exception to the colour black for advocates dress on the ground that it was the colour of black

    Next Story