Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

25 Feb 2022 9:10 AM GMT

  • Hijab Ban- Karnataka High Court Full Bench Hearing (Day 11)- LIVE UPDATES

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab....

    Karnataka High Court Full Bench will continue hearing on a batch of petitions challenging the hijab ban in educational institutions.

    The matter is before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna S Dixit and Justice JM Khazi will hear the petitions today at 2.30 PM.
    On Monday, Chief Justice sought a clarification from the State regarding its stand on banning hijab. This arose in view of the AG's submission that the Government Order dated February 5, which has been challenged in the writ petitions, does not prescribe any ban on hijab and that it is only an ""innocuous" order which asks students to follow the uniforms prescribed by their institutions.
    During one of the previous hearing, the High Court clarified that the interim order passed by it on February 10, which prohibited wearing of religious dresses by students in classrooms, will apply to both degree colleges and Pre-University (PU) Colleges, where uniform has been prescribed.
    Yesterday, Senior Advocate Devadatt Kamat made his rejoinder arguments for Muslim girl students, challenging the action of a government PU college in denying their entry for wearing a hijab (headscarf). Kamat argued that people who want to wear head scarf are denied right to education on the pretext of this GO. "Their right to education which is paramount is being put on back burner. As a state you should facilitate and create an enabling atmosphere."
    Opposing State's submissions on the aspect of Constitutional Morality, Kamat added that Sabarimala and Navtej Johar judgments that were cited by the Advocate General are "pro-choice" judgments. "Constitutional morality is pro-choice. It is a restriction on state power," he said.
    Yesterday, the Court also heard Senior Advocate AM Dar for students of another college who were denied entry. It also heard Senior Advocate Guru Krishnakumar for the Respondents.
    FOLLOW THE LIVE UPDATES HERE

    Live Updates

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:36 AM GMT

      Naganand : The point he is making is if the minutes are of 2018, then how can it be in the resolution of 2021. This is the point he is making.

      Naganand says it is a typographical error.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:35 AM GMT

      Tahir submits that the CDC uniform resolution is fabricated for the purpose of the case. "I can show from the document itself", he says.

      SS Naganand : There is a typographical error in the document which he is pointing out.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:33 AM GMT

      CJ : We are finishing the matter today. We will reserve the judgement today.

      Tahir seeks time to make some factual clarification. Bench allows.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:30 AM GMT

      Jha: Wehn we talk from islam, it originated from Saudi Arabia, two years back they allowed women to drive. Thousands of women applied for license. Saudi prince talks of women empowerment. Nation First. You must follow the law of the land first.

      CJ : Alright, alright.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:30 AM GMT

      Jha refers to a Malaysian court judgment which held wearing of turban by a Muslim boy was not essential just because it was worn by the Prophet.

      "This is an answer to Mr.Dar and others", he says.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:25 AM GMT

      Jha: Refers to Malaysian court judgement.

      Justice Dixit: Advocates are traveling to foreign countries without visa

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:23 AM GMT

      Sr Adv AM Dar takes objections to Jha's submissions : My learned friend attributing motives to senior advocates. Not fair. Let's go by ethics.

      Jha : No No...Mr Dar..We have same years of practice..

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:21 AM GMT

      Jha : Filing of such petitions at regular intervals?. How many hours of judicial time your lordships had to waste?

      CJ : We will consider. We have already called for a report from the Govt.

      Jha : 10 more mins.

      CJ : We have heard you

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:20 AM GMT

      Jha : There is one Vinod Anna from Andhra, who has released videos. Then there is another gentleman Mr.Iyer who has given details of the sinister organization. One outfit is banned, and it starts in another name.

    • 25 Feb 2022 10:19 AM GMT

      Jha : Attendant circumstances indicate that there is more to it than meets the eye. Prima facie credible information is only necessary to set criminal law into motion. Court may call for a report from Union of India.

      CJ : Show prima facie material.

    Next Story