Top Stories

Triple Talaq: Const Bench Rejects Centre's Plea To Decide On Polygamy And Nikah-Halala

LiveLaw News Network
15 May 2017 6:20 AM GMT
Triple Talaq: Const Bench Rejects Centres Plea To Decide On Polygamy And Nikah-Halala
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Constitution bench hearing challenges to triple talaq, today rejected Centre's plea to also decide validity of polygamy and nikah-halala but assured the issues will be kept open and "decided by an appropriate bench at an appropriate time".

On the third day of hearing commencing arguments for the Centre, AG Mukul Rohatgi said all three issues triple talaq, nikah halala and polygamy were interlinked and court should decide on the other two also.

"All 3 are before the court by virtue of a reference made by a two judge bench and the prayers in the petition before the court" AG Rohatgi said.

Then Chief Justice J S Khehar said:" we have taken a conscious decision that we will look into triple talaq only. We will but keep the issues open. It will decided later".

AG's arguments

All forms of talaq are unconstitutional and have to be struck down. AG gave personal assurance that if the court does that there would be no legislative vaccum and centre would immediately enact a law. Court must exorcise talaq and hold it as immoral and violative of Art 14, 15, 21 and 51.

When Indira Jaising asked to AG 'why can't u do it now', AG said Supreme Court is the upholder of constitutional rights upon  which CJI said we are also upholders of minority rights. CJI also said that tenets of a religion cannot be tested by judicial review.

AG also said that a large number of Muslim countries or countries with overwhelmingly large Muslim population, such as, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, Morocco, Tunisia, Turkey, Indonesia, Egypt and Iran have undertaken significant reforms and removed the practice of ‘instant triple talaq.

The Centre had earlier filed two affidavits in the apex court opposing such practices. The government had said there is no reason that women in India should be denied their Constitutional rights' when "Muslim countries where Islam is the state religion have undergone extensive reform" in this sphere.

"The fact that Muslim countries where Islam is the state religion have undergone extensive reform goes to establish that the practices in question cannot be regarded as integral to the practice of Islam or essential religious practices. Secularism being a hallmark of Indian democracy, no part of its citizenry ought to be denied access to fundamental rights, much less can any section of a secular society be worse off than its counterparts in theocratic countries, many of which have undergone reform," said the government's affidavit.

The Centre argued that triple talaq is 'misplaced' in a secular country like India.

Taking a progressive stand, the Centre told the highest court in its affidavit that validity of triple talaq and polygamy should be seen in light of gender justice. It said that triple talaq goes against the principle of gender equality, calling it 'unfair, unreasonable and discriminatory.'

It is to be noted that opposing petitions of nearly seven aggrieved Muslim women who wanted the SC to scrap the practice, the All-India Muslim Personal Law Board has filed a response saying Constitution does not touch upon the personal laws and therefore the SC cannot examine the question of constitutional validity of the practices of marriage, divorce and maintenance in Muslim personal law

Next Story