Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 427 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 438Nominal IndexSK v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 427Lucky v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 428Anmol Jain v Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 429Prem Masih v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 430MR v M 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 431DKP v MK 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 432RPT v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 433Child in Conflict with Law v State of MP...
Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 427 to 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 438
Nominal Index
- SK v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 427
- Lucky v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 428
- Anmol Jain v Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 429
- Prem Masih v State of Madhya Pradesh 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 430
- MR v M 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 431
- DKP v MK 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 432
- RPT v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 433
- Child in Conflict with Law v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 434
- AAM v State of MP 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 435
- Bafgna Hospital v Indore Municipal Corporation 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 436
- Shravan Kumar Soni v State 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 437
- Shahin v New India Assurance Co 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 438
The Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed an accused's plea challenging the framing of charges under Section 306 (abetment of suicide) IPC, observing that the mere absence of a suicide note cannot by itself be a ground for discharge when the material on record raises grave suspicion of abetment of suicide.
Case Title: SK v State of MP, Criminal Revision No. 1097 of 2025
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 427
NSA Detention Order Invalid If It Doesn't Specify Period Of Detention: MP High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that a detention order passed under the National Security Act is unsustainable in law if it does not specify the period for which the said order is to remain in force.
Case Title: Lucky v State of MP, WP-33978-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 428
MP High Court Upholds IT Rules Allowing Social Media Platforms To Remove Copyright-Infringing Posts
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a plea by a social media content creator challenging the removal of his Instagram posts over alleged copyright infringement and the subsequent suspension of his account.
Case Title: Anmol Jain v Union of India, Writ Petition 4503/2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 429
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that personal monetary gain by each accused is not necessary for investigating offences of cheating, forgery, or criminal conspiracy.
Case Title: Prem Masih v State of Madhya Pradesh, MCRC-8058-2024
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 430
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that a mere allegation about a mother's character cannot justify the issuance of a search warrant under Section 97 CrPC to recover a child from her custody.
Case Title: MR v M, MCRC-6323-2018
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 431
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has upheld the rejection of a husband's divorce petition, observing that his failure to make any effort to bring his wife back after obtaining a decree for restitution of conjugal rights showed that he had no genuine desire to resume cohabitation.
Case Title: DKP v MK, FA-228-2021
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 432
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that even though Section 107 of BNS deals with abetment of suicide of a child, the prosecution still has the burden to disclose the ingredients of the offence.
Case Title: RPT v State of MP, MCRC-10367-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 433
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that prolonged detention of a child-in-conflict with law in Observation Home, when the natural guardian is ready to take full responsibility, is contrary to the rehabilitative and reformative object of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
Case Title: Child in Conflict with Law v State of MP, CRR-3824-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 434
The Madhya Pradesh High Court observed that the prosecutrix, being an educated, financially independent woman working as a bank manager, does not, by itself, determine whether her consent was allegedly obtained through deception.
Case Title: AAM v State of MP, MCRC-22093-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 435
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has imposed costs of ₹1 Lakh on an erring officer of the Indore Municipal Corporation for passing an order by relying on statutory provisions that were omitted in 2020.
Case Title: Bafgna Hospital v Indore Municipal Corporation, WP-44683-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 436
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the State authorities to conclude eviction proceedings over alleged encroachments at the ancient Shri Vishnu Barah Mandir in Majhauli, Jabalpur district, preferably within three months. The direction came in a PIL seeking the monument's conservation and protection.
Case Title: Shravan Kumar Soni v State, WP 1563/2018
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 437
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has clarified that claimants receiving motor accident compensation are not required to open a bank account with Union Bank of India for disbursement of compensation and that the amount can be transferred to an account in any nationalised bank.
Case Title: Shahin v New India Assurance Co, CR-1066-2026
CITATION: 2026 LiveLaw (MP) 438