Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 01 To January 07, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 21NOMINAL INDEXKHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION v. GIRDHAR INDUSTRIES AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1VINOD KUMAR v. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 2CIT Versus RRPR Holding Pvt. Ltd. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 3Neelam Azad v. State 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 4Sanket Bhadresh Modi v. Central Bureau Of Investigation & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 5Court In Its Own v. S Gurumurthy 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 6SANJAY SINGHAL v. STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 7HARE KRISHNA PATHAK v. KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 8BHAVNEET SINGH v. IRCON INTERNATIONAL LIMITED THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 9X v. Y 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 10MAHUA MOITRA v. DIRECTORATE OF ESTATES, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 11AMAR SINGH BHATIA & ANR. v. SIR GANGA RAM HOSPITAL & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 12Hyatt International-Southwest Asia Ltd. Versus Additional Director Of Income Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 13R v. THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 14POOJA SHARMA BAJAJ v. KUNAL BAJAJ & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 15PUMA SE v. INDIAMART INTERMESH LTD 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 16RAHUL DILIP SHAH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 17RS Wires Industries Versus Sales Tax Officer Class 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 18SUNIL KUMAR ALEDIA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 19Harshdip Singh Dhillon Versus Union Of India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 20M/S Mittal Footcare Versus The Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 21Goodwill Acquired After 'Terminus Ad Quem' Inconsequential: Delhi HC Declines Interim Relief To 'Khadi' In Trademark Infringement SuitTitle: KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION v. GIRDHAR INDUSTRIES AND ANR.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1The Delhi High Court has refused to pass interlocutory injunction order against two entities from using “Girdhar Khadi” and “BR Khadi” marks in a trademark suit filed by Khadi and Village Industries Commission.Justice C Hari Shankar however directed the two manufacturers to maintain accounts of the manufacture, stock and sales of their products bearing the two marks and file accounts with the court every three months, pending disposal of the suit.Accused Can't Be Denied Right To File SLP On Ground Of Unsatisfactory Jail Conduct: Delhi High Court Grants ParoleTitle: VINOD KUMAR v. STATE (GNCT OF DELHI)Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 2The Delhi High Court has observed that the right to effectively pursue legal remedy by filing Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court, which is the last hope for availing justice, cannot be denied to an accused on the ground of “unsatisfactory conduct.”Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma said that such a right cannot be withheld or the remedy denied to an accused on the ground that free legal aid is available in the jail and SLP can be filed from there. Actual Interest Expenditure Had To Be Adjusted Against Income Earned By Way Of Interest: Delhi High CourtCase Title: CIT Versus RRPR Holding Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 3The Delhi High Court has held that actual interest expenditure had to be adjusted against the income earned by way of interest.The bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Girish Kathpalia has observed that the assessee has parked its surplus funds in fixed deposits of the bank from which it earned interest income. At the same time, the assessee has also paid interest to the bank. The interest earned has to be netted off with interest expenditure.Parliament Security Breach: Delhi High Court Dismisses Accused Neelam Azad's Plea Seeking Release From CustodyTitle: Neelam Azad v. StateCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 4The Delhi High Court has dismissed a habeas corpus petition moved by accused Neelam Azad, arrested over the security breach in the Parliament last month, seeking immediate release from police custody.A division bench comprising Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Manoj Jain observed that the plea is not maintainable as Azad has already moved bail plea before the trial court.“…the petition is not maintainable and is dismissed accordingly,” the bench said.Accused Can't Be Coerced To Reveal Passwords Of Digital Devices While Trial Is Ongoing: Delhi High Court Grants BailTitle: Sanket Bhadresh Modi v. Central Bureau Of Investigation & Ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 5The Delhi High Court has recently observed that an accused cannot be coerced to reveal or disclose the passwords or any other similar details of the digital devices or gadgets seized during investigation while the trial is ongoing, in view of the protection guaranteed under Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India.Justice Saurabh Banerjee said that the investigating agency cannot expect an accused to "sing in a tune which is music to their ears", more so when such an accused enjoys the Constitutional protection against self-incrimination.Delhi ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 01 To January 07, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags