Arbitral Award Holder Must Return Amount Withdrawn From Court After Insolvency Resolution: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has held that where an arbitral award passed against a company is under challenge, and the company later successfully comes out of insolvency, the award holder cannot retain money withdrawn from court deposits if the claim itself is wiped out under an approved resolution plan. The court said such amounts must be returned, as the award itself no longer survives....

LiveLawBiz: Business Law Daily Round-Up: January 01, 2026

TAX CBI Court Convicts Central Excise Inspector In Disproportionate Assets Case, Awards 5 Yrs Imprisonment & ₹63 Lakh Fine; Wife Jailed For Abetment Gujarat High Court Grants Relief After Transfer Pricing Objections Were Mistakenly Filed Before Wrong Authority, Quashes Final AssessmentTree Plantation & Maintenance In Non-Forest Areas By Charitable Trust Exempt From GST: Gujarat...

Refunds Under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Cannot Be Enforced Under Insolvency Jurisdiction: NCLT Chennai

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) at Chennai has held that refunds claimed under the Vivad Se Vishwas–I Scheme, a government COVID-19 relief measure that allows MSMEs to seek return of most performance guarantees forfeited during the pandemic, cannot be enforced through insolvency proceedings under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. In a recent order, the tribunal...

Liquidator Cannot Claim Fee On SARFAESI Realisations Outside Liquidation Estate: NCLT Ahmedabad

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) at Ahmedabad recently held that when a secured creditor enforces its security interest under the SARFAESI Act without involving the liquidator, the amount realised does not form part of the liquidation estate. The liquidator therefore count in that sale to compute the liquidator's fee.A coram of Judicial Member Shammi Khan and Technical Member...

Delhi High Court Rejects Zydus Plea Against Helsinn's Nausea Medication Patent

The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with the grant of a pharmaceutical patent for a nausea medication dismissing a challenge by Zydus Healthcare Ltd. against Swiss drugmaker Helsinn Healthcare SA The court held that the Patent Office committed no jurisdictional error and did not violate principles of natural justice while granting the patent. In a judgment dated December 24, 2025, Justice Tejas Karia clarified that a pre-grant opposition and the examination of a patent application...

Intellectual Property Rights Annual Digest 2025- Part 3

Patents Act, 1970 International Reports US Court Orders EscapeX, Lawyers To Pay Google USD 2.5 Lakh As Cost For Frivolous Patent Suit Case Title: EscapeX IP LLC v. Google LLC The U.S. Federal Circuit upheld orders directing EscapeX to pay Google over USD 2.5 lakh in attorney fees, finding that EscapeX filed a frivolous patent suit and then prolonged the case with an...

Bombay HC Restores IMAX's Enforcement Of Foreign Awards Against E-City, Holds Res Judicata Bars Re-Agitation Of Limitation At Later Stage

The Bombay High Court has recently restored enforcement proceedings initiated by IMAX Corporation for execution of foreign arbitral awards against E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt Ltd for breach of contractual obligations, holding that the doctrine of res judicata applies even between different stages of the same enforcement petition. The court said it cannot revisit an objection...

Mere Interest In Project Does Not Justify Impleadment Of Non-Signatory In Arbitration Without Contractual Participation: HP High Court

The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed a writ petition holding that mere financial or consequential interest was insufficient to implead a non-signatory in the arbitration proceedings unless the stringent tests as laid down by the Supreme Court which include participation in the negotiation, performance or termination of contract were satisfied. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel...

Delhi High Court Bars Use Of “IGBC” Name Over Similarity With US Green Building Council Mark

The Delhi High Court has permanently restrained Mumbai-based Deming Certification Services Private Limited from using the marks “International Green Building Council,” “IGBC,” or any deceptively similar to the mark of U. S. Green Building Council (USGBC). The court held that the use infringed the registered trademarks of the USGBC, a non-profit organisation that promotes sustainability in building design, construction, and operation, and provides green building certification services. It...

Service Tax | Penalty U/S 78A Cannot Be Imposed On Director Without Proof Of Knowledge Or Wilful Default: CESTAT Mumbai

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that a penalty under Section 78A of the Finance Act, 1994, cannot be imposed on a director unless it is established that the director was responsible for the company's business and was knowingly involved in the tax evasion. C J Mathew (Technical Member) referred to Section 78A of the Finance Act,...

Customs | Penetrating Oil Not Adulterated Diesel Unless Revenue Proves Adulteration; Higher Duty Demand Unsustainable: CESTAT Mumbai

The Mumbai Bench of Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that merely because penetrating oil contains petroleum fractions exceeding 70%, it cannot be treated as adulterated diesel unless the revenue proves actual adulteration. Dr. Suvendu Kumar Pati (Judicial Member) and M.M. Parthiban (Technical Member) stated that ……In the penetrating oil,...

Buyer Cannot Reject Goods After Putting Them To Use: Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Against Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing

The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ("Arbitration Act"), holding that once goods are put to use by the buyer, such conduct amounts to deemed acceptance under section 42 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 ("SOGA"), the buyer cannot later reject the goods on the ground of alleged defects. A claim for damages can be filed...