Madras High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025

Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 To 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 38 NOMINAL INDEX S Ve Shekar v State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 Thol.Thirumavalavan v. Dr.V.Vedha @ Dhamodharan, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 2 Mark Studio India Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 3 Dr Jenbagalakshmi v The State of Tamil Nadu and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 4 M. Nagappan v. The Management, 2024 LiveLaw (Mad) 5 C Kannaiyan and Others v Deputy Commissioner of Labour – I, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 6 K. Ezhilarasi v The Senior Divisional Manager, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 7 Udumalpet Sarvodaya Sangham v. The Authority, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 8 K. Shiva Kumar v State and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 9 S Muralidharan v Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 10 P Bhaskar v The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 11 A. P. Raju v. The State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 12 R. Eswaran v. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 13 Chinnakalai v The Tahsildar (Social Welfare Scheme) and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 14 X v. The Chairperson and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 15 A Shankar @ Savukku Shankar v The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 16 M/s. Unique Builders Vs The Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 17 Dr. C. Vijayabaskar v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 18 Mohammed Tharik Anvar @ Thar v. State of Tamil Nadu, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 19 HCL Technologies Ltd. v. X, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 20 State Secretary v Additional Chief Secretary and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 21 Ganesan v. The Commandant, TN Special Police Force, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 22 C.Kohila v The Additional Chief Secretary and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 23 Ameen Batcha v The State, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 24 P. Anandasundaresan v. M/s. Akshaya Pvt Ltd, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 25 R Kathiravan v The Divisional Engineer and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 26 Los Gatos Production Services India LLP v Wunderbar Films Private Limited, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 27 The Secretary TNPSC v R Saravanan and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 28 Thirumaran v The Inspector of Police and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 29 XX v. The Inspector of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 30 Fakrudeen v. The Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 31 ABC v. XYZ, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 32 Matrimony.com Ltd v. People Interactive (I) Pvt Ltd, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 33 PhonePe Private Limited v. BundlePe Innovations Pvt. Ltd, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 34 Sri Nithyananda Swami v The Commissioner and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 35 A. Jacob Sahariah v. The District Collector and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 36 Dharamshi K. Patel & Anr. vs. Indian Bank & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 37 M/s.Annai Angammal Arakkattalai v. The Joint Commissioner or GST (Appeals), Coimbatore, 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 38 REPORTS Madras High Court Refuses To Interfere With Conviction Of Actor-Politician S. Ve Shekar For Comments Against Women Journalists Case Title: S Ve Shekar v State Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 1 The Madras High Court has refused to interfere with the conviction of Actor-Politician S. Ve Shekar for his derogatory comments against women journalists. Justice P Velmurugan noted that though Shekar had apologized, an apology itself would not be sufficient. The court added that once the contents are released and seen by persons, the complainants would be degraded and apologising would not remove the image from the public. 'Only Said What Was Stated In Manusmriti': Madras High Court Quashes Case Against MP Thol Thirumavalan For Alleged Comments On Hindu Women Case Title: Thol.Thirumavalavan v. Dr.V.Vedha @ Dhamodharan Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 2 The Madras High Court has quashed a case registered against Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK) party head and Lok Sabha MP Thol Thirumavalan for alleged comments against Hindu women. The case was registered based on a complaint in 2020 alleging that Thirumavalan, in one of his interviews had made comments lowering the Hindu women. Justice P Velmurugan noted that Thirumavalan had only spoken about what has been stated in the Manu Smriti and thus offence was not made out. Thus, noting that nothing was available to prosecute Thirumavalan, the court was inclined to quash the complaint on the file of District Munisff-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Peraiyur, Madurai. FAOs And JAOs Have Concurrent Jurisdiction For Assessment, Re-assessment Or Re-Computation U/S 147 Income Tax Act: Madras High Court Case Title: Mark Studio India Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer and Others Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Mad) 3 The Madras High Court recently clarified that both the Faceless Assessment Officer and Jurisdictional Assessment Officer have concurrent jurisdiction as far as assessment, re-assessment or re-computation under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy made it ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025

Upasana Sajeev

Tags