Madras High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations 133 to 155]

Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 133 To 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 155 NOMINAL INDEX Sundaresan Suresh Kumar Versus Assessment Unit, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 133 BR Aravindakshan v. Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 134 M/s. Prime Store and others v. Sugam Vanijya Holdings Private Limited and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 135 Jayaraman TM v The National Commission for Scheduled Castes and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 136 Ilavarsan v The Superintendent of Police and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 137 Vaishnavi Jayakumar v The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 138 M/s. Apollo Hospitals Enterprises Ltd. Versus Union of India, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 139 Dr. R Pavithra v The Commissioner of Police and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 140 S.Periyaraja v. The Principal Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 141 P Ayyakannu v. The Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 142 Dr T Murugavel v The Additional Chief Secretary and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 143 Mathiyari v The District Collector and Others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 144 Harini v. The State of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 145 M. Suveathan vs. The State Commission for Protection of Child Rights and Ors, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 146 K Singaravelu v The Government of Tamil Nadu and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 147 Desiya Deiveega Murpokku Kazhagam v Election Commission of India and another, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 148 Annalakshmi v. The District Collector and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 149 Parvathi Sunitha Kumaran v. The District Collector and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 150 Raja v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 151 Tamil Nadu Ayush Sonologist Association v. The Union of India and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 152 Rajini v The Superintendent of Police and others, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 153 E Anna Yesudhas v The District Collector, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 154 Vadivel and others v State, 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 155 REPORTS Assessee Was Given Only 13 Hours Time To Reply To The Show-Cause Notice: Madras High Court Quashes Assessment Case Title: Sundaresan Suresh Kumar Versus Assessment Unit Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 133 The Madras High Court has quashed the assessment as the assessee was given only 13 hours to reply to the show-cause notice. The bench of Justice M. Dhandapani has directed the department to consider the matter afresh and, after providing an opportunity to the petitioner, pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks. The court observed that the second show cause notice was issued to the petitioner on March 27, 2023, at 19.10 p.m., and the petitioner was given time to respond until 9.00 a.m. on March 28, 2023, a clear violation of natural justice principles. Madras High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban On 'The Kerala Story' Movie, Says Can't Assume It Will Create Problems Case Title: BR Aravindakshan v. Union of India and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 134 The Madras High Court on Thursday dismissed a Public Interest Litigation seeking ban on the release of the multilingual movie, "The Kerala Story". BR Aravindakshan, a Chennai-based journalist had filed the petition stating that the movie will affect the country's sovereignty and unity causing disturbance to the public order. He contended that the movie was an intentional attempt to portray the State of Kerala as a terrorist-supporting state. He also submits that if the movie is allowed to be released, it'll be a humiliation to the entire country as it'll create an impression that India is a country that produces terrorists. When the case was taken up today, the vacation bench of Justice AD Jagadish Chandira and Justice C Saravanan dismissed the PIL after observing that the Kerala High Court and the Supreme Court had already dealt with the issue regarding the release of the movie. The court also asked the petitioners how they could assume that the movie would create law and order problems without watching the movie. Provisions Regarding Appointment And Disqualification Of Arbitrator Are Mandatory, Will Apply To Retired Judges As Well: Madras High Court Case Title: M/s. Prime Store and others v. Sugam Vanijya Holdings Private Limited and others Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Mad) 135 The Madras High Court has recently held that the provisions for disqualification for appointment as arbitrator under the Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act would be applicable to any person, including a retired judge. The court noted that the provisions with respect to ineligibility and disqualification are mandatory and non-derogable. Justice Krishnan Ramasamy thus set aside an arbitral award that was passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by one of the parties to the dispute. National Commission For Scheduled Caste Has Powers Of Civil Court But Cannot Pass Interim or Permanent Injunction Orders: Madras ...

Madras High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations 133 to 155]

Upasana Sajeev

Tags