Homebuyers Or Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant Not Entitled To File Avoidance Application: NCLAT Delhi

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”), New Delhi Bench, comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan (Chairperson), Shri Barun Mitra (Technical Member) and Shri Arun Baroka (Technical Member), has held that as per Section 25(2)(j) of IBC the Resolution Professional alone is empowered to file application for avoidance of transactions which are preferential, fraudulent, undervalued or extortionate in nature. The Homebuyer of the Corporate Debtor's real estate project or the unsuccessful resolution applicant is not entitled to file any application for avoidance of transactions under IBC. Background Facts E & G Global Estates Ltd. (“Corporate Debtor”) is engaged in the business of real estate development and has developed a project named 'Holiday Homes'. On 24.06.2020, the Corporate Debtor was admitted into Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (“CIRP”) by the NCLT. The Resolution Professional constituted the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with SIDBI having 20.40% vote share and Home Buyers as class of creditors with 79.60% vote share. On 14.01.2021, the Forensic Auditor so appointed submitted a Forensic Audit Report (“FAR”). On the basis of FAR, the Resolution Professional filed an application (IA 107 of 2021) under Section 66 of IBC, alleging that fraudulent transactions were undertaken by certain allegedly illegitimate home buyers of Holiday Homes Project with suspended directors of Corporate Debtor. The Resolution Professional prayed for cancellation of voting rights of such homebuyers for filing fraudulent claims. Relief was also sought against the suspended directors for returning money back to the Corporate Debtor which had been siphoned off through circular transactions. G S Constructions and Asha Sanap (“Successful Resolution Applicant/SRA”) submitted resolution plans for the Corporate Debtor. On 20.04.2021, the CoC in its 8th CoC meeting approved the resolution plan of SRA with 79.60% vote share. While the IA 107/2021 was pending before NCLT, the Homebuyers (“Appellants”) filed IA No. 1777 of 2021, seeking removal of alleged illegitimate home buyers from CoC and disregard their votes casted in 8th CoC meeting; reconstitution of CoC and other reliefs. On 17.11.2021, the NCLT in IA 107/2021 directed removal of fraudulent home buyers from CoC and reconstitution of CoC. The order was challenged before NCLAT and the matter was remanded to NCLT for re-consideration. The IA 107/2021 remained pending adjudication thereafter. G S Constructions, the unsuccessful resolution applicant, filed IA No. 1609 of 2021 praying for removal of alleged illegitimate home owners from the CoC; reconstitute the CoC and call for fresh voting besides rejection of resolution plan by SRA. The NCLT vide order dated 11.08.2023 approved the plan of SRA and dismissed the IA No. 1777 of 2021, while avoidance application of Resolution Professional was pending adjudication. The Appellant Homebuyers, who constituted 16.53% vote share, filed an appeal before NCLAT against order dated 11.08.2023. The Appellants contended that if the votes of illegitimate home buyers are excluded, then the result of the voting on the resolution plan of SRA would have been different. While the question of reconstitution of CoC was still pending in IA 107 of 2021, the approval of the resolution plan of the SRA by NCLT was against IBC. NCLAT Verdict The Bench noted that none of the Appellant homebuyers raised any objection regarding constitution of CoC until the 7th CoC meeting. The IA 1777/2021 was filed only after the plan submitted by the SRA was approved. The Bench opined that as per Section 25(2)(j) of IBC, the Resolution Professional alone can pursue avoidance applications. The homebuyers or unsuccessful resolution applicant are not entitled to file an application before NCLT seeking avoidance of transactions. “The statutory construct of IBC clearly puts the onerous responsibility of pursuing avoidance applications on the RP. In terms of Section 25(2)(j) of the IBC, it is the duty of the RP to file appropriate applications for avoidance of transactions which fall under the ambit of preferential, fraudulent, undervalued or extortionate transactions. When the statutory scheme clearly states that it is the duty of Resolution Professional to determine the nature of such transactions and file an appropriate application before the Adjudicating Authority, neither the Appellants-1 being home buyers themselves nor the GSC as unsuccessful resolution applicant are entitled on their own to file applications seeking avoidance of transactions.” The NCLT in its order dated 11.08.2023 had observed that even if the votes of alleged illegitimate home buyers are excluded, the plan of the SRA would still have fetched requisite percent of votes. While relying on the Supreme Court judgment in Jaypee Kensington Boulevard Apartments Welfare...

Homebuyers Or Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant Not Entitled To File Avoidance Application: NCLAT Delhi

Pallavi Mishra

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Pallavi Mishra

Homebuyers Or Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant Not Entitled To File Avoidance Application: NCLAT Delhi

Pallavi Mishra

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Pallavi Mishra

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers