All High Courts Weekly Round-Up [June 27 To July 3, 2022]

Allahabad High Court NOMINAL INDEX Irfan v. State of U.P. 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 303 Manish v. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 304 Bhagwati Singh @ Pappu v. State of U.P 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 305 Mohar Pal And Another v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 306 Orders/Judgments of the Week Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Beating People Who Were Raising Slogan Of 'Jai Sri Ram' Case title - Irfan v. State of U.P. Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 303 The Allahabad High Court on Monday granted conditional bail to a man accused of beating people were returning back to their house raising the slogan of 'Jai Sri Ram. The Bench of Justice Jayant Banerjee ordered the release of the accused (Irfan) on a personal bond of Rs 50,000 and on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/ with two sureties. Can't Allow Bail On Parity When Co-Accused Was Granted Bail Without Assigning Any Reasons: Allahabad High Court Case title - Manish v. State of U.P Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 304 The Allahabad High Court has observed that if bail is granted to similarly placed co-accused persons without assigning any reasons, then, on the basis of such bail orders, merely on the ground of parity, the bail application should not be allowed. Essentially, the Bench of Justice Sameer Jain was dealing with the case of one Manish who was seeking bail in connection with a murder case wherein it was alleged that he, along with his parents ablazed a lady by pouring kerosene oil on her. Allahabad High Court Upholds Life Term In Eight Time National Badminton Champion Syed Modi Murder Case Case title - Bhagwati Singh @ Pappu v. State of U.P Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 305 The High Court upheld the life sentence awarded to an accused in connection with the murder of an eight-time National Badminton Champion Syed Modi, who represented India in various international championships. The Bench of Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Saroj Yadav took into the record the evidence adduced before it to conclude that Modi was killed by firing made by convict/appellant along with one another accused by using fire arm. Sections 4 And 5 Of CrPC Do Not Apply To Offences Under IPC: Allahabad High Court Case title - Mohar Pal And Another v. State Of U.P. And 2 Others Case citation: 2022 LiveLaw (AB) 306 The High Court held that the provisions of Sections 4 and 5 of the CrPC do not apply to offencs committed under the Indian Penal Code and that these provisions are applicable when any special act comes into operation. The Division Bench of Justice Kaushal Jayendra Thaker and justice Gautam Chowdhary passed this order while hearing a petition filed by Mohar Pal And Another and observed that Sections 4 and 5 of CrPC pertain to the procedure where the offence under a particular Act is committed. Other updates from the High Court [Prayagraj Demolition] "Building Was Used As 'Welfare Party Of India' Office, Had Javed's Nameplate": UP Govt Tells Allahabad HC Defending its move to demolish the residence of Welfare Party Of India's leader Javed Pump (an accused in the Prayagraj violence case) by the district administration and Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) on June 12, the UP Government has told the Allahabad High Court that the building had Pump's nameplate and the same was being used a party's office. This response has been filed by the State Govt pursuant to the Allahabad High Court's June 28 order wherein it had sought its reply on the plea moved by the wife of the Prayagraj Violence (June 10) accused Javed Mohammad.Bombay High CourtOcean Sparkle Limited. V Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And anr; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 233Ajay Vaishampayan v. Union of India; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 234Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited Versus The Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority and Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 235Ashish Ashok Chakor v. State of Maharashtra; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 236Mohammad Raisuddin v The National Investigating Agency and anr; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 237Master Dhairya Pritesh Bansod vs. The Principal, Mothers Pet Kindergarten, Nagpur and ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 238The Board of Control for Cricket in India Versus Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation and anr; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 239'A' versus State of Maharashtra and Anr.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 2401. Undisputed Claims Can't Be Set-Off Against Unliquidated Damages That Are Not Ascertained: Bombay High CourtCase Title : Ocean Sparkle Limited. V Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And anrCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 233The Bombay High Court recently has observed that set-off of unliquidated damages that are not ascertained or admitted against an undisputed claim is not tenable.Single judge G.S. KULKARNI reiterated that a Section 9 Court would not be unduly bound by procedural law contained in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the underlying...

All High Courts Weekly Round-Up [June 27 To July 3, 2022]

Shrutika Pandey

Tags