News Updates

Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea To Quash Notices To Recover Public Loss From Anti-CAA Protesters [Read Order]

Akshita Saxena
11 Feb 2020 12:56 PM GMT
Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea To Quash Notices To Recover Public Loss From Anti-CAA Protesters [Read Order]
Citing pendency of similar case in SC, the HC dismissed the petition
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging notices issued by the District Administration of State of Uttar Pradesh to recover damages for alleged loss of public property during the anti-CAA protests.

The division bench of Justice Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar said that it was not inclined to adjudge a matter that is already pending before the Supreme Court.

The Petitioners had moved the high court for quashing of the impugned show-cause notices. The standing counsel however, argued that,

"similar question is pending before the Apex Court, in which cognizance on the issue has been taken and, therefore, at this stage, the present writ petition is not maintainable before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India."

Taking note of the same, the bench dismissed the petition, while clarifying that if any adverse order is passed against the petitioners, they may challenge the same in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

Allegedly, the December 19, 2019 protests in Lucknow and other parts of the state caused many causalities and substantial loss to public and private property, including Govt. buses, media vans, motor bikes, etc.

Thereafter, the state govt. of UP issued show cause notices under Sections 3 and 4 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 and under Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, to those allegedly involved in the protests

These notices came to be challenged before the Supreme Court in a writ petition titled Parwaiz Arif Titu v. State of UP.

Therein, the Petitioner has contended that the recovery notices, that have been issued pursuant to the 2010 verdict of the Allahabad High Court in Mohammad Shujauddin v. State of UP, Writ – A N0.40831/2009, are contrary to the law of the land laid down by the Supreme Court in In Re: Destruction of Public and Private Properties v. Govt. of Appellant, (2009) 5 SCC 212.

The Petitioner has asserted that the high court order is contrary to the Supreme Court ruling inasmuch while the Supreme Court put the onus of assessment of damages and recovery from the accused on High Courts of every State, the Allahabad High Court on the other hand had issued guidelines in that let the State Government to undertake these processes.

Case Details:

Case Title: Mohammad Kaleem v. State of UP

Case No.: Misc. Bench No. 3714/2020

Quorum: Justice Pankaj Kumar Jaiswal and Justice Karunesh Singh Pawar

Appearance: Advocates Priyanka Singh, Abhay Pratap Singh, Anchal Gupta and Ashma Izzat (for Petitioner); Standing Counsel Manish Mishra (for State)

Click Here To Download Order

Read Order

Next Story