Top
News Updates

Allahabad HCBA Writes To Chief Justice Raising Concerns About Rejection Of Bail Applications Ex Parte [Read Order]

Akshita Saxena
18 April 2020 11:37 AM GMT
Allahabad HCBA Writes To Chief Justice Raising Concerns About Rejection Of Bail Applications Ex Parte [Read Order]
x
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Allahabad High Court Bar Association has written a letter to Chief Justice Govind Mathur raising concerns about rejection of bail applications ex parte, during these untoward times of nationwide lockdown.

On April 14, the high court had issued an office order suspending the operation of Para 17 of the e-filing procedure which stipulated that if an Advocate fails to appear through video-conferencing on the date and time slot fixed for him, the Court may proceed to decide the matter on merits, exparte.

The letter points out that despite the Office Order of April 14, bail applications in many criminal cases were being rejected ex-parte.

"We may point our that the paragraph No.17 of the notice for E-filing had been suspended by notice dated 14.04.2020 and an impression was given to litigants and lawyers that in the extreme situation of E-filing and taking tip of pending matters in the absence of counsel the absolutely unknown and new procedure being adopted would entail that no adverse orders would be passed exparte while the same impression has been created by your earlier notices with respect to the working of the courts during the lockdown," the HCBA said.

It added,

"We have randomly pointed out only two cases rejecting Bail Application which have been passed by the Honible Judges without hearing the applicant counsel. We fervently hope that these are only two orders which have been passed without hearing counsel."

The Association said that such incidents have put lawyers to "personal embarrassment" and even "allegations of failure to discharge professional duties". It said,

"We use this opportunity to point out that judicial discipline and propriety sustain the faith of the lawyers and litigants in the judicial system and passing adverse orders exparte especially in Bail Applications when counsel are not in a position to argue their briefs on account of the lockdown would not be conducive to the administration of justice and would necessarily result in situations where the litigant would he put to adverse consequences without any legal assistance."

Thus the Association has urged the Chief Justice to issue appropriate guidelines for disposal of cases and ensure strict implementation during these extraordinary and unfortunate times.

"We request you that appropriate instructions be issued framing clear cut guidelines and policy which are to be strictly and uniformally adopted during existing process of hearing matters including matters pending or freshly riled. The lawyers in the above cases have been put to personal embarrassment and even allegations of failure to discharge professional duties which is unfortunate and avoidable."

Read Letter



 


Next Story