Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: June 2022 [Citations 199 - 239]

NOMINAL INDEX Pravin Sahebrao Bhogawade v The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 199 Nauman Suleman Khan v State of Maharashtra & anr 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 200 Dr. Lekha Rajesh Visaria v The State of Maharashtra and Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 201 D.K. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd versus Kishore Agarwal and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 202 Becharabhai B. Chauhan v Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. And connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 203 Anurag S/o. Padmesh Gupta vs Bank of India 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 204 Suresh Ladak Bhagat v The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 205 Nawab Malik vs UOI 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 206 Gautam Kamlakar Pardeshi and anr v The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 207 Seema Jagdish Patil v The National Hi-Speed Rail Corporation Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 208 D.K. Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd versus Kishore Agarwal and Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 209 Suresh Ladak Bhagat v The State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 210 Latabai vs State of Maharashtra & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 211 Anand Singh vs The State of Maharashtra, with connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 212 Choice Developers vs Pantnagar Pearl CHS Ltd. & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 213 Narayan vs Mrs. Sangita and anr 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 214 State of Maharashtra vs Adarsh Waterparks Pvt Ltd 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 215 Jar Productions Private Limited vs The Union of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 216 Ravi Goenka vs The Bombay Presidency Radio Club Ltd. & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 217 Harmesh Singh Chadha @ Jimmy vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 218 Esrar Nazrul Ahemad Versus State of Maharashtra 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 219 Mohammad Nawab Mohammad Islam Malik @ Nawab Malik vs The Directorate of Enforcement 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 220 Priya Rishi Bhuta & Anr. vs Vardhaman Engineers and Builders & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 221 Mr. Nikhil Shyamrao Bhamare vs State of Maharashtra and another 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 222 Bhanushali Studios Ltd. & Ors vs Telegram Messenger LLP & Anr 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 223 HMG Industries Ltd vs Canara Bank 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 224 Raymond Ltd. & Anr vs New Sarnath Co-op. Hsg. Soc. Ltd. & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 225 Anil Chandravadan Mistry vs The State of Maharashtra & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 226 Mr. Sunil vs Union Bank of India 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 227 M/s Angerlehner Structural and Civil Engineering Company vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 228 Kaalkaa Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs Municipal Corporation of Gr. Mumbai & Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 229 M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. vs The Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 230 Shri. Kiran Damodar Paygode and Anr vs The Union of India represented by the General Manager 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 231 Vijay and ors vs Ravindra Ghisulal Gupta 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 232 Ocean Sparkle Limited. V Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. And anr; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 233 Ajay Vaishampayan v. Union of India; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 234 Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Limited Versus The Board of Trustees of Jawaharlal Nehru Port Authority and Ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 235 Ashish Ashok Chakor v. State of Maharashtra; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 236 Mohammad Raisuddin v The National Investigating Agency and anr; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 237 Master Dhairya Pritesh Bansod vs. The Principal, Mothers Pet Kindergarten, Nagpur and ors.; 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 238 The Board of Control for Cricket in India Versus Regional Director Employees State Insurance Corporation and anr 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 239REPORTS Anxiety No Excuse To Assault Public Servant Discharging Public Duty: Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail With Warning Case Title - Pravin Sahebrao Bhogawade v The State of Maharashtra Citation : 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 199 The Bombay High Court clarified that citizens, no matter how anxious they are or how serious their grievance is, are not permitted to take the law in their own hands and/or adversely deal with Public officials discharging their lawful duty. Bombay High Court Quashes Sexual Assault FIR Under POCSO Act As Victim (Now A Major) & Accused To Marry Case Title – Nauman Suleman Khan v State of Maharashtra & anr Citation : 2022 LiveLaw (Bom) 200 The Bombay High court quashed an FIR under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) for penetrative sexual assault, as the victim girl (now a major) said that she and the accused were allegedly in love and are now to be married. The court observed it was "inclined to accept the request for quashing the FIR, only by considering their future. If the prosecution still remains, it will come in their peaceful life." [SC/ST Act] Can't Seek "Extra-Judicial Remedies" To Pressurize Prosecution: Bombay HC Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To Principal After Teacher Puts Arrest Banner Case Title : Dr. Lekha Rajesh Visaria v The...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: June 2022 [Citations 199 - 239]

Sharmeen Hakim

Tags