"Custodial Deaths A Concern For Civilized Society": Allahabad HC Denies Bail To Cop Booked For Mercilessly Assaulting Man In Custody

"Custodial violence, custodial torture and custodial deaths have always been a concern for civilized society," observed Allahabad High Court today as it denied bail to a policeman who has been booked for causing custodial death of a man in the year 1997. Denying him bail, the Bench of Justice Samit Gopal further noted that the judicial verdicts of the Apex Court and other Courts have shown their concern and anguish in such matters. Facts in brief On December 28, 1997 at about 04:00 AM, a person (name not known) came along with the Sub-Inspector, Police Station Kotwali, District Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh and other police personnel of the said Police Station including the present applicant to the house of the first informant (the son of the deceased) and they forcibly caught hold of the deceased and while assaulting, took him inside the Jeep, and took him away. The first informant (son of the deceased) went to Police Station Phoolpur and to different Police Stations in District Varanasi to know the whereabouts of his father but he could not know anything. Subsequently, on March 2, 1997 at about 08:00 AM, a police constable from Police Station Phoolpur came and told him that a wireless message was received from Shahdol PS that his father has died due to heart attack. When he reached Shahdol, he got to know that his father was brought from Varanasi to Police Station Kotwali, District Shahdol by the police personnel including the applicant before the Court and they mercilessly and inhumanly assaulted his father due to which his father died in the Police Station itself. It was also said that the police in order to conceal the factum of murder in conspiracy with the doctors of District Hospital, Shahdol have shown the admission of his father in the hospital one hour prior to his death and have shown the death in the hospital whereas his father had died at Police Station Kotwali itself. Legal proceedings during the year 1997 to 2021 When all the police stations and police officials refused to register an FIR in the matter, the first informant filed an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi and the investigation began in the matter as FIR was ordered by CJM. A final report was filed in 1998, a protest petition was filed by the applicant in 2001, which was accepted in 2007 by the lower court, rejecting the final report and summoning the accused persons for offences under Sections 364, 304, 506 IPC. Thereafter, a 482 petition was moved before the High Court by the applicant/co-accused and the Court stayed the proceedings in the case, and the matter was heard finally in 2012 and the judgment was reserved, however, the judgment could not be delivered and the matter was directed to be listed for rehearing in 2013. Till then the stay on the proceedings continued. Thereafter, the first informant moved the Apex Court in 2018 and hearing the matter in 2020, the Court vacated the Allahabad HC order of 2007 passed in the 482 Cr.P.C. petition and directed the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi to proceed with the matter in accordance with the law. Thereafter, the accused and co-accused filed for and got pre-arrest bail from the High Court, however, challenging the said orders, the First informant again moved the Apex Court and finally, the Supreme Court in May 2021 set aside the orders of anticipatory bail granted in the petition of the applicant and other co-accused persons. The Court also directed them to apply for regular bail and thereafter, the applicant surrendered on May 19, 2021 before the court below at Varanasi and filed application for bail which was rejected and therefore, the Applicant moved High Court seeking regular bail. Court's observations As per the case of the prosecution, the Court noted, the deceased was taken to the Police Station Kotwali, District Shahdol from Varanasi by the accused/applicant cop and he was also present at the Police Station and when the deceased feel ill, he was still present there. Further, noting that there is nothing to show that the death was natural and the instant case is a case of custodial torture and death, the Court remarked thus: "The deceased as per the postmortem report has received injuries on his body which are suggestive of assault on him by hard and blunt object. There is no finding in the postmortem examination report which would be suggestive of any heart problem or cardiac arrest/heart attack." The Court also noted that the Apex Court vide order dated 23.09.2020 passed in Writ Petition (Crl.) No. 8 of 2018 has directed the trial court to proceed with the trial on a day today basis and make an endeavor to conclude it within a period of one year. In the backdrop, denying his bail plea, the Court remarked thus: "The applicant is a resident of a different State. He has been in the police force which...

"Custodial Deaths A Concern For Civilized Society": Allahabad HC Denies Bail To Cop Booked For Mercilessly Assaulting Man In Custody

Sparsh Upadhyay

Tags