Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 4 To April 10, 2022

CITATIONS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 266 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 297NOMINAL INDEXSacheerome Advanced Technologies (SAT) versus NEC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (NECI) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 266RANA AYYUB v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 267LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED & ANR. v. AABTAK CHANNEL.COM (JOHN DOES) & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 268DR NAND KISHORE GARG v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 269IRCON International Limited v. GPT-Rahee JV 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 270Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited versus Teracom Limited 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 271India Tourism Development Corporation Ltd (ITDC) versus Bougainvillea Multipex & Entertainment Centre Pvt Ltd (BMEL) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 272Mother Sparsh Baby Care Pvt Ltd v. Aayush Gupta & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 273M/S KARAM CHAND THAPAR & BROS. (COAL SALES) LTD. v. MMTC LTD. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 274CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. PREM BHUTANI & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 275Kirti Lata v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 276Delhi Rozi-Roti Adhikar Abhiyan v. Union of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 277Vijay Kumar Munjal V. Pawan Kumar Munjal 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 278SHALEN BHARDWAJ (ADVOCATE) v. MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 279Mahavir Prasad Gupta versus Union of India & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 280SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR. v. UNFADING OPC PRIVATE LIMITED 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 281GIAN CHAND BANSIWAL v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 282AMAN VACHAR v. UNION OF INDIA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 283MAMTA v. RISHIPAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 284Glocaledge Consultants Pvt Ltd versus Rec Power Distribution Company Limited 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 285V. P. SINGH @ VIJENDER PAL SINGH v. STATE AND ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 286The Indian Hotels Company Ltd. v. Union Of India And Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 287Dr. Vidyottma Jha v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 288American Express India Private Limited Versus ACIT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 289Ajay Singh v. State 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 290Virtual Perception Opc Pvt Ltd versus Panasonic India Pvt Ltd 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 291Shailendra Kumar Yadav V State 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 292Tata Capital Financial Services Limited versus Naveen Kachru Proprieter of M/S South Delhi Motorcycle & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 293CIT (E) Versus India HIV Aids Alliance 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 294SHIVAM SONI v. STATE(GNCTD) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 295ANNIE GURMEHER KAUR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 296Ecogreen Energy Gwalior Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Municipal Corporation, Gwalior 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 297JUDGMENTS THIS WEEK1. Challenge Against Arbitrator Appointment, Can't Be Under Section 14 Of The A&C Act ; Delhi High CourtCase Title: Sacheerome Advanced Technologies (SAT) versus NEC Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (NECI)Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 266The Delhi High Court has ruled that Section 14 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not provide a separate remedy to the parties to challenge the appointment of an arbitrator, notwithstanding the provisions under Section 13 of the Act.The Single Bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru held that a party can challenge the appointment of an arbitrator only according to the procedure set out in Section 13 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act and that a petition under Section 14(1) could not be filed to challenge the appointment of an Arbitral Tribunal on the grounds mentioned under Section 12(3) of the Act, i.e., on the ground of justifiable doubts as to the independence or impartiality of the Arbitrator.2. "Devoid Of Merits, Infringing Her Right To Travel Abroad & Freedom Of Speech & Expression": Delhi High Court Quashes LOC Against Journalist Rana AyyubTitle: RANA AYYUB v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 267The Delhi High Court has quashed the look out circular issued by the Enforcement Directorate against journalist Rana Ayyub on the ground of it being devoid of merits as well as for infringing her human right to travel abroad and freedom of speech and expression.Justice Chandra Dhari Singh observed that the LOC was issued in haste and despite the absence of any precondition necessitating such a measure."An LOC is a coercive measure to make a person surrender and consequentially interferes with petitioner's right of personal liberty and free movement. It is to be issued in cases where the accused is deliberately evading summons/arrest or where such person fails to appear in Court despite a Non-Bailable Warrant. In the instant case, there is no contradiction by the respondent to the submission of the petitioner that she has appeared on each and every date before the Investigating Agency when summoned, and hence, there is no cogent reason for presuming that the Petitioner would not appear before the Investigation Agency and hence, no case is made out for issuing the impugned LOC," the Court said.3. "Reputation & Goodwill Well Established": Delhi High Court Passes John Doe Order In Favour Of 'AAJ TAK' In Trademark Infringement SuitCase Title: LIVING MEDIA INDIA LIMITED & ANR. v. AABTAK CHANNEL.COM (JOHN DOES) & ORS.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 4 To April 10, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags