Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: July 4 To July 10, 2022

NOMINAL INDEXCitations 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 599 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 633Case Title: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 599Case Title: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 600Case Title: SH AWANEESH CHANDRA JHA v. ANIL PRASAD NANDA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 601Case Title: JOHNSON JACOB v. STATE 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 602Case Title: DHRUV TEWARI v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 603Case Title: Gulati Enterprises versus Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 604Case Title: SAMARPAL & ORS v. UOI & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 605CASE TITLE: MR. VIJAY GUPTA v. MR. GAGNINDER KR. GANDHI & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 606Case Title: IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD. v. REACON ENGINEERS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 607Case Title: Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. Punam Devi, CS(COMM) 504 of 2019 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 608Case Title: OSRAM GMBH v. TEJMEET SINGH SETHI AND ANR. CS(COMM) 84 of 2022 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 609Case Title: ANISH GUPTA v. UNION OF INDIA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 610Case Title: SHIV LINGAM v. THE STATE AND ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 611Case Title: SH. NARDEV SONI AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 612Case Title: Social Jurist v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 613Case Title: DSIIDC v. H.R. Builders, FAO(OS)(COMM) 77 of 2022 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 614Case Title: VIJAY SWAROOP LAV v. MS NISHA RATHI & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 615CASE TITLE: NIPPON A&L INC. v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 616Case Title: Dr Nand Kishore Garg v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 617Case Title: M/S Path2way HR Solutions v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 618Case Title: Deepak Upadhyay v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 619Title: IMRAN v. STATE OF DELHI THROUGH COMMISSIONER OF DELHI POLICE & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 620Case Title: Umesh v. State (and other connected matters) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 621Case Title: 3M COMPANY v. MR. VIKAS SINHA & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 622Case Title: NIKHIL GUPTA v. TANU GUPTA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 623Case Title: HUDA ANSARI & ANR. v. JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 624Case Title: NOVO NORDISK A S v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 625Case Title: BRIGHT LIFECARE PVT. LTD. v. VINI COSMETICS PVT. LTD. & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 626Case Title: CITICAP HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 627Case Title: ROHITASH v. THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER OF DELHI AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 628Case Title: Amit Sahni v. GNCTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 629Case Title: MRS. ANUGYA GUPTA v. MR. AJAY KUMAR & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 630CASE TITLE: PHILIPS LIGHTING HOLDING B.V. v. JAI PRAKASH AGARWAL AND ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 631Case Title: HEMA GUSAIN v. INDIA INTERNATIONAL CENTRE AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 632CASE TITLE: BEST AGROLIFE LIMITED v. DEPUTY CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 6331. Delhi High Court Asks Centre To Consider As Representation Concerning Plea For Changing 'VT' Sign Written On Indian AircraftsCase Title: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 599The Delhi High Court has asked the Central Government to consider a representation regarding a plea for changing the Call Sign 'VT' (Victorian Territory and Viceroy Territory) written on Indian aircrafts.A division bench comprising of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad granted liberty to Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay appearing in person to approach the concerned Ministry by way of a representation and also directed the said Ministry for considering it in accordance with law in a reasonable period of time.The plea argued that VT sign is a reflection of colonial rule and that India being a sovereign country cannot be a territory of the Viceroy. It also claimed that most of the countries which went through colonial servitude have got rid of such signs and launched their own code.2. High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea To Regulate Production & Consumption Of Intoxicating Drinks In DelhiCase Title: Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 600The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a petition moved by BJP leader and Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay seeking to prohibit or regulate the production, distribution and consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs in the national capital.Ashwini Upadhyay, who was appearing in person, stated before the Court that the liquor shops established in the city were near schools or hospitals or religious places and were established contrary to the provisions as contained under Delhi Excise Act, 2019 read with Delhi Excise Rules 2010.At the outset, the Bench remarked "The statute is there and everyone has to follow the statute."3. Lady Justice Is Blindfolded Only To Be Non-Partisan, Not To Be Blind To Mischief Or Fraud Played Out By Dishonest Litigants: Delhi High CourtCase Title: SH AWANEESH CHANDRA JHA v. ANIL PRASAD NANDACitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 601"Lady...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: July 4 To July 10, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: July 4 To July 10, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers