Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: May 9 To May 15, 2022

NOMINAL INDEXCitations 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 425 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 449Case Title: BELA CREATION PVT LTD v. ANUJ TEXTILES 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 425 Case Title: Amit Gupta Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence Headquarters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 426 Title: NIKITA CHANDEL v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 427 Title: GEETA SINGH v. PRADEEP SINGH 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 428 Title: STARBUCKS CORPORATION v. TEAQUILA A FASHION CAFE & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 429 Case Title: Youth Against Crime v. Union of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 430 Title: KRISHNAN SUBRAMANIAN v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 431 Title: LAXMI & ANR v. SHYAM PRATAP & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 432 Case Title: RIT Foundation v. UOI and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 433 Case Title: Kedar Nath Babbar Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 434 Case Title: Union of India versus Delhi State Consumer Co Operative Federation Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 435 Case Title: Millennium School v. Pawan Dawar, O.M.P. (COMM) 590/2020 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 436 Case Title: PEPSICO INC. & ANR. versus JAGPIN BREWERIES LIMITED & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 437 Case Title: Extramarks Education India Private Limited V. MES Central School, ARB. P. 327 OF 2022 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 438 Case Title: Kiran Infra Engineers Limited versus Northern Railway 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 439 Title: AZHAR RASHEED v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 440 Title: x v. Y 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 441 Title: GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. SATBIR & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 442 Case Title: GAIL (India) Ltd. V. Trivendi Engineering & Industries LTD. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 443 Case Title: Gujarat Gas Ltd. v. Vedanta Ltd and Ors., O.M.P.(I)(COMM) 125 of 2022 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 444 Case Title: MALVINDER MOHAN SINGH v. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 445 Case Title: NIRMAL JINDAL v. SHYAM SUNDER TYAGI & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 446 Title: JASBIR SINGH v. STATE 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 447 Case Title: SHRI HARI SHAMSHER KAUSHIK v. SHRI JASBIR SINGH, MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S ACCURA CARE PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 448Case Title: MILLENNIUM EDUCATION FOUNDATION V. EDUCOMP INFRASTRUCTURE AND SCHOOL MANAGEMENT LIMITED 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 4491. Bounden Duty Of Counsel To Ensure That Pleadings Filed Before Court Are Intelligible: Delhi High Court Expresses Word Of CautionCase Title: BELA CREATION PVT LTD v. ANUJ TEXTILESCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 425The Delhi High Court has observed that in cases where parties are represented by counsel, the said counsel have a bounden duty to ensure that pleadings, filed before a Court, are intelligible. Giving a word of caution, Justice C Hari Shankar expressed displeasure over filing of an application of the petitioner under Order VII Rule 14 of Code of Civil Procedure after opining that the same did not contain a single sentence which was grammatically or syntactically correct.Thus, the Court rejected a plea challenging an impugned order dated 24th February, 2022 wherein the Trial Court had rejected an application under Order VII Rule 14 filed by the petitioner, defendant in the civil suit, with costs of Rs. 5000.2. Bail Amount Can Be Paid By Cash Ledger, Debit Ledger Of ITC: Delhi High Court Refuses To Cancel Bail Of A Person Accused of Fraudulently Availing ITCCase Title: Amit Gupta Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence HeadquartersCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 426The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Mukta Gupta has ruled that the bail amount can be paid by cash ledger and debit ledger of the Input Tax Credit (ITC). It has been alleged by the department that the petitioner is one of the directors/key persons in M/s Brilliant Metals Pvt. Ltd., M/s Progressive Alloys India Pvt. Ltd. and M/s JBN Impex Pvt. Ltd. and allegedly the mastermind behind devising a mechanism of availing ITC on the strength of bills of various suppliers which were non-existing and fictitious, thus availing fraudulent ITC worth Rs. 27.05 crores, which he further passed on. The petitioner received a total of Rs. 260 crores in ITC from the three companies.3. Every Lawyer Appearing For Client Has A Right Of Fair Hearing Irrespective Of Who The Complainant Is: Delhi High CourtTitle: NIKITA CHANDEL v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI and other connected matters Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 427 Every lawyer, who appears for his client, has a right of fair hearing, irrespective of who the complainant is," the Delhi High Court has recently observed recently. Justice Talwant Singh was dealing with a plea filed by seven accused persons seeking anticipatory bail directly in the High Court after claiming that since the complainant was an advocate, a fair hearing before the District Court was not possible because their counsels may be heckled during arguments.4. Company Has To Be Proceeded Against By Giving An Opportunity To Be Heard Where It Has Also Been Accused, No Liability Only Qua Private Persons: Delhi...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: May 9 To May 15, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags