Delhi High Court Weekly Roundup: July 18 To July 24, 2022

NOMINAL INDEXCitations 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 663 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 706FIROZ AHMAD v. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DELHI AND ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 663 Glitter Overseas and Ors. v. MMTC Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 664 Rahul Bhardwaj v. Union of India & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 665 KRANTI ARORA v. DIGJAM LTD & O.P. KHAITAN (HUF) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 666 Chithra N & Ors. v. AIIMS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 667 SATVIR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 668 Court on its own motion v. DGCA & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 669 ABHISHEK RAY v. R. PAUL AND ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 670 Sunil Bhatia Versus Serious Fraud Investigation Office 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 671 PRADEEP KUMAR v. SMT BHAWANA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 672 MR. NEERAJ BHASIN v. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, DELHI & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 673 SARVAN KUMAR ALIAS KISHAN v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 674 DESH DEEPAK SRIVASTAVA & ORS. v. DELHI HIGH COURT & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 675 PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORECEMENT 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 676 SANDEEP WALIA v. MONIKA UPPAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 677 KNITPRO INTERNATIONAL v. EXAMINER OF TRADE MARKS THROUGH REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 678 VISHESH TANEJA v. REETA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 679 National Restaurant Association v. Union Of India & Anr 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 680 Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 681 Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 682 Shanghai Electric Group Co. Ltd. v. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 683 MS X THROUGH HER LEGAL GUARDIAN v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 684 VIPUL AGGARWAL v. INCOME TAX OFFICE 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 685 SMT USHA RANI & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 686 HARJI ENGINEERING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. PUNJAB AND SIND BANK & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 687 RITU GAUBA ADVOCATE v. HIS EXCELLENCY LT. GOVERNOR, DELHI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 688 TV TODAY NETWORK LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 689 NITIN REKHAN v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 690 MS. M VICTIM v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH S.H.O. & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 691 Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Ltd. v. Paltech Cooling Towers & Equipments Litd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 692 RAKESH KUMAR SHARMA v. MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLES PVT LTD 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 694 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 versus M/s Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 695 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-I Versus Future First Info. Services Pvt. Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 696 JAGBIR v. STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 697 HINA & ANR. v. THE STATE & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 698 NOVI DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD. v. W1.123MOVIES11.COM & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 699 SATYANARAIN KHANDELWAL v. PREM ARORA And other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 700 UNITED SIKHS v. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, DELHI POLICE & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 701 HELL ENERGY MAGYARORSZAG KFT v. SHRI BRAHM SHAKTI PRINCE BEVERAGES PVT LTD & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 702 KUSHAL ANAND v. MANDHIR SACHDEVA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 703 JINDAL KUMAR v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 704 NATCO PHARMA LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 705Celerity Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Versus Dy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 73-1 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 7061. High Court Cannot Exercise Jurisdiction Under Article 227 To Monitor Progress Of Cases Before Fora Below: Delhi HCCase Title: FIROZ AHMAD v. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DELHI AND ORSCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 663The Delhi High Court has observed that the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India cannot be exercised by High Courts to monitor the progress of cases before lower courts."It is not possible for this Court, exercising jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to monitor the progress of cases before the fora below," Justice C Hari Shankar observed.The Court was dealing with a petition filed under Article 227 seeking a direction to the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to decide a case expeditiously, preferably on day-to-day basis and adjudicate the appeal on merits.2. The Rejection Of An Application Under Section 34 Of The A&C Act Cannot Be Construed To Mean That The Court Has Concurred With The View Of The Arbitral Tribunal: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Glitter Overseas and Ors. v. MMTC Ltd.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 664The Rejection Of An Application Under Section 34 Of The A&C Act Cannot Be Construed To Mean That The Court Has Concurred With The View Of The Arbitral Tribunal: Delhi High CourtThe High Court of Delhi has held that merely because the challenge to an arbitral award is dismissed by the Court exercising powers under Section 34 of the A&C Act would not mean that the court has concurred with the...

Delhi High Court Weekly Roundup: July 18 To July 24, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags