Delhi High Court Weekly Roundup: March 7 To March 13, 2022

CITATIONS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 172 TO 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 201NOMINAL INDEXAlapan Bandyopadhyay v. Union of India & Anr. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 172Mujeeb Ur Rehman v. Registrar General, Delhi HC 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 173Kurz India Private Limited Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, New Delhi 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 174Jai Singh Goel Versus Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax(Central) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 175Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi Versus Shugan Chandra Kothari Trust 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 176Kailash Gahlot Vs. Vijender Gupta & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 177BHAGWATI TRANSFORMER CORP. AND ORS v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 178SHAHEED TEG BHADUR COLLEGE OF PHARMACY v. PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 179DEVINA SHARMA v. HIGH COURT OF DELHI THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 180PURAN CHAND GUPTA & ORS. v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 181SHRI ASHOK PANWAR & ANR v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 182AMARJEET SINGH DAGAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 183Commissioner Of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 Versus Gracemac Corporation 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 184DABUR INDIA LIMITED v. ASHOK KUMAR & OTHERS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 185CAPT SIMRANJIT SINGH SAMBHI v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 186DIGAMBER JAIN MAHILA ASHRAM v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 187Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central)- 3 Versus M/s Agson Global Pvt. Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 188ROSHAN LATA ARYA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 189Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 190NEETA BHARDWAJ & ORS. v. KAMLESH SHARMA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 191X v. Y 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 192Christian Michel James v. Directorate of Enforcement 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 193Amit Sahni v. State (NCT of Delhi) 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 194La Mode Fashions Private Limited Vs Commissioner, Value Added Tax 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 195ABHISHEK BANERJEE & ANR v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT and other connected matter 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 196AKTIEBOLAGET VOLVO & ORS. v. LAMINA SUSPENSION PRODUCTS LIMITED 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 197MANOHAR LAL SHARMA ADVOCATE v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 198ANJANI GUPTA v. THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 199DHRITIMAN RAY v. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. and other connected matters 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 200DR. BABA SAHEB AMBEDKAR HOSPITAL GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. v. DR. KRATI MEHROTRA 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 201JUDGMENTS/ ORDERS1. Delhi High Court Dismisses Alapan Bandyopadhyay's Plea Challenging CAT's Order Transferring His Case To Delhi From KolkataCase Title: Alapan Bandyopadhyay v. Union of India & Anr.Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 172The Delhi High Court has dismissed the plea filed by Former West Bengal Chief Secretary Alapan Bandyopadhyay, challenging the order passed by Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench which had transferred his petition filed before the Kolkata Bench to the Principal Bench at New Delhi.The Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Jyoti Singh while pronouncing the order today observed that it sees no reason to interfere with the impugned order. However, the Court has not expressed any opinion on the disciplinary proceedings including competence of the Central Government to issue charge sheet.2. "Considering Issue On Administrative Side": Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking To Adopt 'Virtual Hearings' As A NormCase Title: Mujeeb Ur Rehman v. Registrar General, Delhi HCCitation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 173The Delhi High Court has refused to entertain a public interest litigation, seeking to adopt virtual court hearings as a norm across all the Courts in the national capital.The petitioner, Mujeeb Ur Rehman, stated that virtual court hearings are extremely convenient and time saving, hence, the Court should consider adopting it as a norm in all district courts as well as the High Court.However, the Division Bench of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna stated that the issue is being considered at the administrative side and thus, it sees no reason to entertain the PIL at this stage3. "Considering Issue On Administrative Side": Delhi High Court Refuses To Entertain Plea Seeking To Adopt 'Virtual Hearings' As A NormCase Title: Kurz India Private Limited Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, New DelhiCitation: Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Del) 174The Delhi High Court has quashed the reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 on the grounds that the reason to believe was invalid, had no rational nexus to the belief for escapement of income and there was no fresh material on record to initiate reassessment proceedings.The division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain has opined that the reasoning "the contingent liability has been claimed as revenue expense" is contrary to the concept of contingent liability which...

Delhi High Court Weekly Roundup: March 7 To March 13, 2022

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags