The High Court of Meghalaya on Thursday held that existence of alternate remedy does not operate as an absolute bar to entertain a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution and that a person may approach the high court in case of natural rights violation. "Existence of alternate remedy is not an absolute bar to entertain a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India....
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok