Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: September 2022 [Citation 344 - 385]

Nominal Index: MAHANTESH KOUJALAGI v STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 344 The State of Karnataka v. S.B. Shivashankar. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 345 S.C. MAHESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 346 M.PRAKASH v. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 347 ESHWAR R & others v KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 348 POULAMI BASU v. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 349 M Chiranjeevi v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 350 HARISH A.S. v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 351 S.R. Ravi v. Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 352 DANDELI BACHAO ANDOLAN SAMITHI v STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 353 Abraham T.J v B.S. Yediyurappa & Others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 354 AJ v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 355 M.MANJULA v STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 356 DR. (SMT.) ANITHA PATIL And STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 357 SAYYED SOHEL TORVI v. NATIONAL INVESTIGATING AGENCY. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 358 AMRUTHESH N.P v. THE CHIEF SECRETARY. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 359 VIJAYKUMAR v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 360 SANDEEP REDDY v State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 361 KRISHNAPPA v ASHWATHAMMA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 362 SOMASHEKAR SHANKARAPPA HURUKADLI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw 363 M/S NAMBOOR JEWELLERS v. STATE BY LASHKAR POLICE STATION. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 364 Jaganmayi Builders and Developers Private Limited & Ors. versus Sumanth Reddy & Ors. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 365 MUDIT SAXENA v UNION OF INDIA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 366 B.V. BYRE GOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 367 R D RAMADAS v THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 368 SRI VASAVI EDUCATION SOCIETY v KARNATAKA STATE COMMISSION FOR THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES & ANR. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 369 PRAMOD H. MUTALIK v. DISTRICT COMMISSIONER AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE. 2022 LiveLaw (kar) 370 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v SHANKARAMMA & others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 371 SHIVARAJA @ KULLA SHIVARAJA v COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BENGALURU. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 372 M/s. Subex Limited versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 373 D Reddeppa v. The State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 374 SRK ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED v THE STATE OF KARNATAKA and ors and connected matters. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 375 KARNATAKA EXAMINATION AUTHORITY v. KEERTHANA Y.H & others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 376 MOHAN CHANDRA P v THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 377 Shadakshari C.L & others v Santhosha C.A & others. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 378 AP v. WIPRO LIMITED REPRESENTED. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 379 Siddappa v. State of Karnataka. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 380 Devandrappa v. Huligemma. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 381 THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO., LTD v SAYEEDA KHANAM W/O. LATE AZAM KHAN. 2022 LiveLaw (kar) 382 N.S.VIJAYANTH BABU v. ADVOCATES' ASSOCIATION, BENGALURU(AAB). 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 383 PRIYAMSHU KUMAR And THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 384 K. UMESH SHETTY v. STATE OF KARNATAKA. 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 385 Judgments/Orders 1. Representation Of Peoples Act | S.127A Prescribes Non-Cognizable Offence, Magistrate's Permission Mandatory For Police Investigation: Karnataka HC Case Title: MAHANTESH KOUJALAGI v STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: CRIMINAL PETITION No.5528/2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 344 The Karnataka High Court has said that offence under Section 127-A of the Representation of People Act (Restrictions on the printing of pamphlets, posters, etc) is a non-cognizable offence and hence, permission for police investigation must be granted by Magistrate in terms of Section 155 of CrPC. 2. Minimum Punishment Prescribed U/S 27(d) Of Drugs & Cosmetics Act Can Be Reduced If Accused Enters Plea Bargain: Karnataka High Court Case Title: The State of Karnataka v. S.B. Shivashankar Case No: CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.775 OF 2018 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 345 The Karnataka High Court has upheld a trial court order imposing a sentence less than the minimum punishment prescribed under Section 27(d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, noting that the accused had entered into a plea bargain under Section 265-B of CrPC and had accepted his guilt. 3. Article 350 Constitution | Citizens' Grievance Before Jurisdictional Authorities Can't Be Kept Unconsidered Indefinitely. Karnataka High Court Case Title: S.C. MAHESH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA Case No: WRIT PETITION NO.16625 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Kar) 346 The Karnataka High Court has observed that Article 350 of the Constitution of India mandates that where a citizen raises a grievance before jurisdictional authorities, it cannot be kept unconsidered indefinitely. 4. Issuance Of Multiple Notices By Investigating Authority Does Not Falter...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: September 2022 [Citation 344 - 385]

Mustafa Plumber

Tags