In-Flight Protest Against Chief Minister: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To 3rd Accused

The Kerala High Court on Thursday granted pre-arrest bail to a Youth Congress worker Sujith Narayanan who has been accused of conspiring to protest against Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan on a flight at the Thiruvananthapuram airport.Justice Viju Abraham granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner observing that while the first two accused allegedly involved in the incident were arrested, there was no attempt at all to arrest him. "While two other accused who are alleged to have been involved in the incident were arrested there was no attempt to arrest the petitioner and the petitioner went out of the aircraft like any other passenger. In so far as there is no case that the motive for the alleged incident is of any personal enmity and it was a part of an agitation, there is no reason to believe that the petitioner will repeat the alleged offence."Therefore, it was held that custodial interrogation of the petitioner did not seem necessary in the case. However, considering the contentions raised by the prosecution that the investigation is only in the initial stage and further investigation is to be done to unearth any conspiracy involving other persons, the Court directed the petitioner to co-operate with the investigation. The Court has also granted regular bail to the first two accused in the case. The prosecution case was that the petitioners who were on the same flight on which the Chief Minister also travelling, flouted the directions of the aircraft crew, shouted threats, and rushed toward the Chief Minister, thereby posing a threat to his safety and security. It was also alleged that the petitioners injured the security staff of the Chief Minister and prevented him from discharging his public duty.Advocate V.S. Chandrasekharan appearing for the petitioner argued that the allegations made against him were false and that he was a bonafide passenger. It was submitted that when the flight landed, two passengers shouted some political slogans and that he was not involved in any way with the alleged incident. He argued that he was falsely implicated in an attempt to prevent him from becoming a witness to the incident and spoke about the assault committed by former minister E.P Jayarajan on accused 1 and 2, which he recorded on his mobile phone.On the other hand, Director General of Prosecution T.A.Shaji submitted that the acts alleged to be committed by the petitioner are part of a conspiracy to attack and murder the Chief Minister and to fulfil their common object. It was submitted that all the accused were named in the FIR and the call data showed that they were in constant touch for several days and that the tickets were purchased at the same time, booked using 1st accused's phone and collected by the 2nd accused.However, the Court noted that there was no case for the prosecution that the petitioner was carrying any weapon and admittedly being inside an aircraft, which is a high-security zone, there was no possibility for him to carry any weapon either. It was also found that accused 1 and 2 were arrested on 14.06.2022 and the Sessions Court had also granted their custody to the investigating agency.Moreover, there was no case that any further recovery was to be effected and that if at all it was required, it was always open for the investigating officer to do that even when the petitioner is on bail.Further, the report of the Airport Manager to the Station House Officer only says that they were informed that an alleged altercation took place on board the flight between three passengers who were seated on Seat No. 8A, 8C and 7D. It was in the subsequent report by the Airport Manager that it was revealed that after landing as soon as the seat belt sign went off, the said passengers immediately stood up from their respective seats and rushed toward the Chief Minister, shouting slogans in the vernacular language and upon seeing this one of the passengers travelling with the Chief Minister intervened.Incidentally, the Court noted that at the time of the incident as referred to by the airport manager, the aircraft had several passengers including the personal security officers of the Chief Minister. "Though at this stage of the case, I cannot express my opinion either way as regards the merits of the case, the above stated facts cannot be lost sight of while considering the request of the petitioner for pre-arrest bail. As regards the contention of the learned Director General of Prosecution that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to unravel the larger conspiracy, I am not persuaded to think that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required for that purpose, also considering the fact that two other accused is already in judicial/police custody and are thoroughly interrogated."Although the petitioner is alleged to have been involved in 2 cases, these did not appear to be very serious. Regarding the rigour of Section 6A of the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against...

In-Flight Protest Against Chief Minister: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To 3rd Accused

Hannah M Varghese

Tags