News Updates

Madras HC Orders Rescue Of Elephant Used Illegally For Begging And Marriage Parades [Read Judgment]

Live Law News Network
19 Jun 2019 10:58 AM GMT
Madras HC Orders Rescue Of Elephant Used Illegally For Begging And Marriage Parades [Read Judgment]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Madras High Court has directed the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden to take possession of Malachi, a female elephant aged about 34 years, which was being used illegally for begging and marriage parades.

A Bench of Justices S Manikumar and Subramonium Prasad observed that the Department of Forests may either keep the elephant in a camp or transport her to a zoo, in accordance with law.

The order was passed in a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by an animal lover S. Muralidharan who complained of the ill-treatment of the elephant by one Indira, a Madurai-based lady. Though several representations were made to the authorities highlighting this, they have not cared to act, Muralidharan alleged.

The elephant was originally owned by Mrs. Masan, a resident of Andaman Islands, who had given it to Indira for gifting it to Madurai's Meenakshi temple. However instead of gifting the elephant to temple, Indira started using her for begging and marriage functions.  

The petitioner alleged that the elephant was being subjected to cruelty and that she was not fed properly and was made to walk on hot tar roads. Both her front and back legs are tied using heavy chain. The petitioner also mentioned that a mahout, while riding Malachi had touched an overhead electrical wire, had been thrown off and consequently died. The elephant also suffered electrocution. 

According to the petitioner, the elephant was being ill-treated in  violation of Sections 11(e), 11(f), 11(h) of Prevention to Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and Rules 5, 6(11), 7, 12, 13(5), 13(6) and 1(8) of the Tamil Nadu Captive Elephants Management & Maintenance Rules, 2011 and also under section 42 of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and Chief Wildlife Warden in his counter affidavit stated that Indira was fined several times for ill-treatment and mentioned that her application for ownership certificate of the elephant was rejected. It was added that orders were issued for return of the elephant to Andamans.

Indira had denied the allegations and said that people automatically came and offered money to the elephant while she was walking on the road; the elephant was not used for any begging purpose, she said. She also claimed that the elephant was being taken care of well. However, the Court was not impressed by this argument.

"Even taking it for granted, that the elephant is adequately fed and taken care, the manner in which the elephant has been used, cannot be ignored. Disregard to the statutory rules, is apparent on the face of record", said the Court.

"Material on record shows that fine upto Rs.25,000/- has been imposed on the care takers of the elephant and they have paid the fine. Ownership certificate has not yet been transferred to the third respondent. Material on record further indicates that various provisions of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Tamil Nadu Captive Elephants (Management and Maintenance) Rules, 2011 have been violated", the Court added. 

Click here to download judgment

Read Judgment

Next Story