'Not Secular Money': Madras High Court Restrains HR&CE Dept From Establishing New Colleges

The Madras High Court has put an interim stay on setting up of new educational institutions by the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department, using surplus Temple funds, other than the four colleges that are already set up.A bench comprising of Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice P.D Audikesavalu noted that even though imparting education must be appreciated, the money belonging to a religious denomination cannot be treated as "secular money" that can be applied for a secular purpose. It added that the surplus funds of temples are inevitably the offerings given for a particular cause, and any decision to divert it cannot be taken in absence of Trustees. The Bench also made it clear that functioning of the already existing four educational institutions set up by the department will be subject to the court's final verdict. For the time being, the bench has asked the State to ensure introduction of a subject on Hindu religion, in accordance with Section 66 of Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, on a regular basis, within one month, in the colleges already established at Kolathur in Chennai, Tiruchengode in Namakkal, Oddanchatram in Dindigul and Vilathikulam in Toothukudi. "It is also noted that at the 4 colleges that are ready to be opened, BBA, BCom and similar courses are offered without there being any regular class on religious instructions. The condition precedent for colleges to be opened is that there must be express instruction in Hindu religion. If such course is not introduced within one month of the beginning of college concerned, its functioning cannot be continued. " The petitioner, T. R Ramesh, approached the High Court challenging a GO issued by the Higher Education Department of Tamil Nadu Government for opening eight private colleges by utilising temple funds. ArgumentsTemple funds can't be diverted in absence of TrusteesThe petitioner, appearing in person, argued that a mere policy decision made by a Minister on the floor of the Assembly does not automatically confer upon the government the authority to divert temple funds. He argued that the exercise of opening private colleges couldn't be allowed when trustees were non-existent for those temples; it is the trustees alone who have control over the funds and properties of temples.Also Read: Don't Melt Temple Jewellery Unless Trustees Appointed: Madras High Court Tells State On Gold Monetisation SchemeHe referred to Section 36 of the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious And Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, which talks about the utilisation of surplus funds accumulated by temples. He argued that the cumulative effect of Section 36 conditionally allows the setting up of educational institutions using surplus funds, provided that such proposition must come from the trustees themselves. Conveying such a proposition to the Commissioner for Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowment Department is necessary for it to carry. On the contrary, the Commissioner doesn't possess the power to invoke Section 36 by himself to set up any educational institutions, the petitioner added. Since the temples involved in the case are without any trustees, even if certain 'fit persons' are temporarily fulfilling the duties meant to be discharged by trustees, these 'fit persons' do not have the right to 'alienate temple property', the petitioner submitted.Temple funds can be used for imparting education on Hindu religion The Petitioner contended that while such surplus funds could be used for creating educational institutions, it is dependent on the caveat that the prominent subject must be pertaining to a course on Hindu Religion. Such subject must relate to a denomination or sect pertaining to the relevant temple. A course related to Hindu Religious Institutions is mandatorily required as part of the main curriculum and not an incidental subject.He referred to Section 66 of the Act allows the funds of a temple to be diverted for setting up educational institutions if the "purpose of a religious institution has from the beginning been, or has subsequently become, impossible of realisation".Advocate General S Shanmuga Sundaram relied on Section 97 of the Act and the concept of Common Good Funds to argue that any temple funds available with HR & CE Department by such means can be utilised for setting up colleges.The petitioner, on the other hand, argued that such surplus funds can be primarily used only for restoration, renovation and maintenance of temples under the control of HR & CE Department. The petitioner submitted that Section 97 was envisaged to help out the needy temples in short of funds, and only when that need vanishes can the surplus funds now in Common Good Fund will be utilised for colleges. FindingsThe court, after hearing the arguments from both sides, observed that the appointment of a 'fit person', in the absence of a board of trustees, is...

'Not Secular Money': Madras High Court Restrains HR&CE Dept From Establishing New Colleges

Sebin James

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

'Not Secular Money': Madras High Court Restrains HR&CE Dept From Establishing New Colleges

Sebin James

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers