News Updates

Nirbhaya Case: Delhi Court Adjourns Execution Hearing Till SC Decides Review Plea Of Death Row Convict

Karan Tripathi
13 Dec 2019 6:11 AM GMT
Nirbhaya Case: Delhi Court Adjourns Execution Hearing Till SC Decides Review Plea Of Death Row Convict
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

A Delhi Court on Friday adjourned the execution proceedings in Nirbhaya rape case till one of the convict's review petition is decided by the Supreme Court.

The Additional Sessions Judge Satish Arora of Patiala House Courts said 'I can't pass an order for execution until all the remedies available to the convicts are exhausted'.

While the review petition of 3 out of the 4 convicts was rejected by the Supreme Court in 2017, Akshay's review petition is still pending before the Supreme Court. The said petition will be taken up on December 17.

The proceedings started with three of the convicts, Pawan, Akshay and Vinay, filing their replies to the execution petition. The judge questioned the delay by asking the counsel, 'The petition was filed a year ago, why are you filing your replies now'.

Judge also asked Vrinda Grover, who's the Amicus in the case, about her opinion. She said that as per the law laid down in Shabnam's case, the present matter should be adjourned till the review petition is decided by the Supreme Court.

The Prosecutors in the case, Rajiv Mohan and Irfan Ahmad, opposed the adjournment by arguing that nothing barred the court from passing the execution order. They said:

'As per the judgment in Abdul Razzaq, this court can pass the execution order pending legal remedies. The higher court can always extend the timeline given in the execution order'.

The Prosecutors also referred to section 415 of CrPC and argued that the convicts can always move the High Court to seek extension of the timeline given in the execution order.

It was also argued by the Prosecutors that convicts can only avail criminal appeal against the death order as the matter of right. They cannot avail SLPs and review petitions as a matter of right.

The court rejected the argument of section 415 by noting that the said assumes that the execution order has already been passed. Therefore, it can't be relied upon during the execution proceedings. It said, 'We'll wait for the Supreme Court's order on the review petition'.

Vrinda Grover also supported this observation by saying that if the court passes an order now, it'll be setting a timeline for the Supreme Court to decide the review.

In December 2018, Nirbhaya's parents had moved the Patiala House Court to expedite the procedure of executing the death penalty given to all 4 convicts in the gangrape case of December 16, 2012.

In October this year, the Superintendent at Tihar prison had issued a notice to all the 4 convicts to file their mercy petition before the President.

Next Story
Share it