News Updates

Rajasthan HC Stays FIR Against BJP's Amit Malviya Allegedly For Mocking Congress Leaders On Twitter [Read Order]

6 May 2020 7:53 AM GMT
Rajasthan HC Stays FIR Against BJPs Amit Malviya Allegedly For Mocking Congress Leaders On Twitter [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday stayed the proceedings in furtherance of a FIR registered against Amit Malviya, in-charge of BJP's National Information & Technology wing, registered for allegedly mocking Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Twitter.

Malviya has been accused of mocking the Congress leaders, in response to a comment made by Sonia Gandhi that the prompt caution given by Rahul led to timely arrangement of health infrastructure in the Bhilwara city of Rajasthan, to battle the deadly COVID-19 pandemic.

"Sonia Gandhi claims Bhilwara tested 22 lakh people due to Rahul's warning! Wherever there is Rahul, can exaggeration and maths blunder be behind?," Malviya had tweeted.

In the aftermath of the tweet, the local police in the Hanumangarh Town had registered a FIR against Malviya and the party president JP Nadda.

While the operation of FIR against Nadda was stayed by a single judge-Bench of Justice Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati yesterday, similar relief was granted to Malviya today by the bench of Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur.

"Effect and operation of the FIR No.216/2020 registered with Police Station Hanumangarh Town, Hanumangarh alongwith entire proceedings pursuant thereto qua the present petitioner shall remain stayed," Justice Mathur ordered.

Malviya's counsel had argued that he had merely re-tweeted the contents of the article/ news item published in The Print Magazine and such no case was made out against the Petitioner.

Meanwhile, the public prosecutor representing the state sought time to seek instructions and file a reply in the matter.

The matter is now listed, along with Nadda's pending petition, on July 10.

Pertinently, Nadda had argued the impugned tweet was posted from Malviya's personal account and Nadda had no role in the same, whatsoever.

Both the petitions have been filed seeking quashing of the FIR.

Picture Courtesy: The Hindu

Case Details:

Case Title: Amit Malviya v. State of Rajsthan

Case No.: SB Crl (Misc Petition) No. 1226/2020

Quorum: Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur

Appearance: Sr. Advocate RD Rastogi assisted by Advocates Anand Sharma & Sarthak Rastogi (for Petitioner); Public Prosecutor Gaurav Singh (for State)

Click Here To Download Order

Read Order

Next Story
Share it