News Updates

Remarks On Justice S Murlidhar : Rajasthan HC Dismisses Plea To Initiate Contempt Against BJP Spokesperson Prem Shukla

2 July 2020 2:57 PM GMT
Remarks On Justice S Murlidhar : Rajasthan HC Dismisses Plea To Initiate Contempt Against BJP Spokesperson Prem Shukla
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Rajasthan High Court recently dismissed a petition to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against BJP's National Spokesperson, Prem Shukla, allegedly for insulting Justice S. Murlidhar, then a Judge of the Delhi High Court,

The division bench of Justices Goverdhan Bardhar and Chandra Kumar Songara observed that the impugned remarks were made by Shukla during the course of a debate and were not "deliberately" intended to interfere in the administration of justice.

The criminal contempt case had been filed at the instance of Advocate Poonam Chand Bhandari, also leader of AAP, Rajasthan, stating that Shukla had wilfully insulted the sitting Judge during a TV programme telecasted by News 24 on March 2, 2020.

"The statement made by Respondent no.1 undermined the dignity of judiciary in the country and scandalized or tend to scandalize and lowered the authority of the judiciary," he had submitted.

Finding "no substance" in the allegations, the court observed,

"Taking note of the contents and context, it is pertinent to note that Mr. Prem Shukal, National Spokes Person of Bhartiya Janta Party gave the aforesaid statement while participating in a debate. Thus, the statement given by the Mr. Shukla can not be said to be deliberate interference in the administration of justice."

In the order passed on June 9, the bench added,

"the criminal contempt petition filed by the petitioner is without any substance and is accordingly dismissed."

Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court verdict in Ramlila Maidan Incident, In RE (2012) 5 SCC 1, whereby a division bench emphasized on the significance of right to freedom of speech and expression in the following words:

"The Framers of our Constitution, in unambiguous terms, granted the right to freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peaceably and without arms. This gave to the citizens of this country a very valuable right, which is the essence of any democratic system. There could be no expression without these rights. Liberty of thought enables liberty of expression. Belief occupies a place higher than thought and expression. Belief of people rests on liberty of thought and expression. Placed as the three angels of a triangle, thought and expression would occupy the two corner angles on the baseline while belief would have to be placed at the upper angle. Attainment of the preabled liberties is eternally connected to the liberty of expression."


Next Story
Share it