Patna High Court Monthly Digest: December 2023

Bhavya Singh

30 Dec 2023 4:36 AM GMT

  • Patna High Court Monthly Digest: December 2023

    Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 140-155]Musmat Shanti Devi & Anr vs. Lallu and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 140Lalan Kumar Yadav & Ors vs The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 141Jalaluddin Khan @ Md. Jalaluddin vs The Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 142Mahavir Sharmik and Nirman Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Limited vs State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat)...

    Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 140-155]

    Musmat Shanti Devi & Anr vs. Lallu and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 140

    Lalan Kumar Yadav & Ors vs The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 141

    Jalaluddin Khan @ Md. Jalaluddin vs The Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 142

    Mahavir Sharmik and Nirman Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Limited vs State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 143

    Md. Tazuddin vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 144

    Avinash Kumar Ranjan vs The State of Bihar 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 145

    Navjot Singh Sidhu vs The State of Bihar and Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 146

    The State of Bihar vs. Amar Kumar 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 147

    M/s Trimurti Private Limited vs The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 148

    M/s Friends Mobile vs The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 149

    M/s Ceat Ltd. vs The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 150

    M/s ACC Limited vs. The State of Bihar & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 151

    M/s Micro Zone vs The Union of India and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 152

    Smt. Rudra Maya Sinh vs. The Registrar General and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 153

    Alok Bharti, vs. Jyoti Raj 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 154

    M/s Prince Sanitation Gandhi Path vs. The State of Bihar and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 155

    Judgments/Orders This Month

    Transfer Of Property Act | Unregistered Sale Deed Admissible As Evidence For Considering Relief Of Specific Performance: Patna HC

    Case Title: Musmat Shanti Devi & Anr vs. Lallu and Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 140

    The Patna High Court recently ruled that an unregistered sale agreement remains admissible as evidence in a lawsuit seeking specific performance of the agreement.

    Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra observed, “It is clear from the above that even where the sale agreement is not registered, the document can be received as evidence for considering the relief of specific performance and the inadmissibility will confine itself only to the protection sought for under Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act.”

    Candidates With B.Ed. Not Eligible For Primary School Teaching Jobs: Patna High Court

    Case Title: Lalan Kumar Yadav & Ors vs The State of Bihar & Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 141

    The Patna High Court, while allowing a set of writ petitions challenging a 2018 notification by the National Council of Teacher Education (NCTE), has ruled that candidates holding Bachelor of Education (B. Ed.) qualifications cannot be deemed eligible for appointment as primary school teachers.

    The division bench comprising Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Rajiv Roy observed, “The writ petitions are allowed with the finding that the notification dated 28.06.2018, issued by 'the NCTE' is no longer applicable and the B.Ed candidates cannot be considered eligible for appointment as primary school teachers.”

    'Providing Legal Help To PFI Cadre Not A Terriorist Act': Patna HC Grants Bail To Advocate Accused Of Endangering Security Of India

    Case Title: Jalaluddin Khan @ Md. Jalaluddin vs The Union of Indias

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 142

    The Patna High Court has held that offering legal assistance to banned organizations (such as Popular Front of India cadre) or interviewing candidates for selecting them for giving scholarships would never fall in any one of the proscribed categories of the Terrorist Acts under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.

    Furthermore, the court emphasized that mere membership in a banned organization should not be sufficient grounds for denying bail, especially when the trial is anticipated to extend over an extended period.

    Mere Membership Of A Banned Organization Doesn't Justify Bail Rejection When Trial Is Anticipated To Prolong: Patna HC

    Case Title: Jalaluddin Khan @ Md. Jalaluddin vs The Union of Indias

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 142

    In a recent ruling, the Patna High Court has said that mere membership in a banned organization shouldn't be reason enough to deny bail, particularly when the trial is anticipated to be prolonged.

    The division bench of Justices Ashutosh Kumar and Alok Kumar Pandey said, “Merely being a member of a banned organization, would not justify rejection of bail when the Trial is likely to continue for a longer time.”

    Patna High Court Grants Relief to Cooperative Society, Rules Solid Waste Management Activity Exempt from BGST

    Case Title: Mahavir Sharmik and Nirman Swalambi Sahkari Samiti Limited vs State of Bihar & Ors.

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 143

    In a recent legal development, the Patna High Court has ruled in favor of a Cooperative Society registered under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (BGST Act), stating that the Solid Waste Management Activity undertaken by the petitioner is exempt from BGST. The court quashed assessment orders and demand notices against the Cooperative Society, emphasizing that there is no supply of goods involved in the solid waste management disposal work awarded to the petitioner.

    A division bench of Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Partha Sarthy opined, “There is no supply of goods in the solid waste management disposal work awarded to the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the activity of the petitioner regulated by the work order produced as Annexure-5 and the consideration received for the same would be exempt from the BGST Act.”

    All Orders By Court/ Tribunal Including Ex Parte Are Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction U/Art 226 & 227 Of Constitution: Patna HC

    Case Title: Md. Tazuddin vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 144

    The Patna High Court has observed that any order or judgment issued by a Court or Tribunal, even if done ex parte, can be subjected to the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution.

    Referring to the Supreme Court's 2020 decision in the case of N. Mohan Vs. R. Madhu, Justice Harish Kumar observed, “The analogy, which is deducible from the judgments referred hereinabove, this Court is of the opinion that any order/judgment passed by a Court or Tribunal even if it is ex parte is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and such power cannot be scuttled nor any embargo be fixed thereupon, on the plea of remedy provided under Order IX Rule 13 of the C.P.C.”

    POCSO Act | Imperative For IO To Inquire Into Victim's Age; Medical Opinion/Self-Assessment No Sure Grounds: Patna High Court

    Case Title: Avinash Kumar Ranjan vs The State of Bihar

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 145

    ​​The Patna High Court has observed that the Investigating Officer must ascertain the age of the victim in cases falling under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The court added that relying solely on medical opinion and self-assessment is not a reliable method for determining a person's age.

    The division bench comprising Justice Ashutosh Kumar and Justice Nani Tagia observed, “Be that as it may, with such confusion over the age of the victim, it was the solemn duty of the Investigating Officer to inquire about her age from the school in which she had been studying. It appears from the records of the case that no such effort was made with respect to ascertaining the age of the victim for confirming that she was less than 18 years of age, when she entered into a sexual relationship with the appellant.”

    2019 LS Polls| Patna HC Quashes Case Against Navjot Sidhu For Allegedly Cautioning Muslims Against Splitting Their Votes

    Case Title: Navjot Singh Sidhu vs The State of Bihar and Anr

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 146

    The Patna High Court last week quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu for allegedly violating the restraining orders while appealing and cautioning Muslims against splitting their votes in his address before a public gathering during the 2019 Lok Sabha elections campaign.

    Justice Sandeep Kumar opined, “In my considered opinion, the part of the speech on which the informant has relied upon to show that the petitioner was asking for votes on the ground of religion does not support the allegation. The petitioner has not made any statement which is prejudicial to the maintenance of harmony or is likely to disturb the public tranquillity.”

    Gang Rape & Murder Case: Patna HC Acquits Man Sentenced To Death Noting Prosecution's Sole Reliance On Sniffer Dog Evidence

    Case Title: The State of Bihar vs. Amar Kumar

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 147

    This week, the Patna High Court overturned the death penalty handed down to a man convicted of the murder and rape of a 12-year-old girl. The court reached this decision upon discovering that the prosecution's entire case relied solely on the presence of a sniffer dog entering the accused man's house.

    The division bench of Justices Ashutosh Kumar and Alok Kumar Pandey observed, “We fail to understand as to how the Trial Court proceeded in the same manner as the investigation had proceeded, on the presumption that the dog would never have faulted in entering the house of the appellant. There is evidence of the dog having entered another person's house also. We, for the present, do not say that help of a snifer dog cannot be taken by the police.”

    Patna High Court Grants Stay To Trimurti Private Limited On GST Demand Amid Tribunal Constitution Delay

    Case Title: M/s Trimurti Private Limited vs The State of Bihar & Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 148

    In a recent ruling, the Patna High Court, while adjudicating a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has granted relief to Trimurti Private Limited by issuing a conditional stay on the GST demand. The petitioner sought various reliefs, primarily aiming to avail the statutory remedy of appeal against an impugned order under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (BGST Act).

    Full Pre-Deposit Payment Not To Be Done From Electronic Cash Ledger For Appeals Under Amnesty Scheme: Patna High Court

    Case Title: M/s Friends Mobile vs The State of Bihar & Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 149

    In a notable decision, the Patna High Court has ruled that the Revenue Department lacks the authority to mandate the Appellant to make a complete pre-deposit when filing an appeal under the Amnesty Scheme using the Electronic Cash Ledger.

    The central question addressed in the writ petition pertained to whether, upon initiating an appeal, ten percent of the outstanding amounts should be sourced from the Electronic Cash Ledger or the Electronic Credit Ledger.

    M/s. Friends Mobile (“the Petitioner”) made a payment of ten percent from the Electronic Credit Ledger as required under the amnesty scheme introduced by the Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) for filing appeal.

    Patna High Court Overturns GST Appeal Dismissal Citing Conditions in Notification No. 53 of 2023-Central Tax

    Case Title: M/s Micro Zone vs The Union of India and Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 152

    In a recent ruling, the Patna High Court overturned the dismissal of a GST appeal and reinstated the appeal, contingent upon meeting specified conditions outlined in Notification No. 53 of 2023-Central Tax.

    Emphasizing the significance of adhering to statutory timelines while recognizing the opportunities provided by relevant notifications to revive dismissed appeals under specific conditions, the division bench of Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Rajiv Roy stated, “In this context, noticing the Notification, we also make it clear that wherever we have rejected the writ petitions filed against orders; rejecting appeals for reason of delay being beyond that prescribed under Section 107(4) of the BGST Act; the assessee would be entitled to invoke the said remedy de hors the orders of this Court and avail of the benefit of Notification aforementioned, subject to the conditions therein being satisfied.”

    Bihar VAT Act | Penalty Imposable U/S 56(4)(B) On Account Of Clerical Mistake In Mentioning Of Invoice Number In Suvidha Form: Patna High Court

    Case Title: M/s Ceat Ltd. vs The State of Bihar & Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 150

    Patna High Court has ruled that penalty is imposable under section 56(4)(b) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 (Bihar VAT Act) on account of clerical mistake in mentioning of invoice number in SUVIDHA Form.

    The above ruling came in a case filed by the petitioner, M/s Ceat Ltd. engaged in the manufacture and sale of tyres, tubes and flaps who was concerned with a penalty order passed under Section 60(4) (b) read with Section 56(4) (b) of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 after detention of a truck carrying goods at the integrated check post, Dhobi, Gaya.

    Bihar Entry Tax Act | Adjustment Of Entry Tax Paid On Damaged Cement Against VAT Liability Not Admissible: Patna High Court

    Case Title: M/s ACC Limited vs. The State of Bihar & Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 151

    In affirming the directive of the Commercial Tax Tribunal, the Patna High Court ruled that the adjustment of entry tax paid on damaged cement is not permissible under the Bihar Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Areas for Consumption, Use, or Sale therein Act, 1993. The court reiterated and upheld the tribunal's decision, reinforcing that the provisions of the aforementioned act do not allow for the adjustment of entry tax in the case of damaged cement.

    'Claim Made After 30+ Yrs Is Grossly Delayed': Patna HC Rejects 96 Y/O Widow's Plea For Family Pension, Cites Lack Of Substantiating Material

    Case Title: Smt. Rudra Maya Sinh vs. The Registrar General and Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 153

    In a recent ruling, the Patna High Court dismissed a petition filed by a 96-year-old widow, seeking a family pension for her late husband, a retired Judicial Officer, citing a gross delay of more than 30 years in the claim, coupled with a lack of substantiating material to establish her marital status and her husband's service history.

    The division bench of Chief Justice K. Vinod Chandran and Justice Rajiv Roy observed, "The claim made now after more than 30 years is grossly delayed. The petitioner herein also does not have any substantiating material to indicate that she was married to the Judicial Officer."

    Social Torture By Spouse, Levelling False Allegations Of Extramarital Affairs Constitute Mental Cruelty In Marriage: Patna High Court

    Case Title: Alok Bharti, vs. Jyoti Raj

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 154

    In a noteworthy judgment, the Patna High Court has declared that making baseless accusations of adultery, fornication, and coerced prostitution by a woman against her husband not only constitutes harassment and character assassination but also tarnishes the individual's public reputation in society.

    The division bench of Justice P B Bajathri and Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya observed, “The leveling of false allegation by one spouse to the other having alleged illicit relations with different persons outside the wedlock amounted to mental cruelty. In the present case, respondent – wife alleged allegations before the employer of appellant and in the domestic violence allegations of soliciting prostitution by appellant and his mother and appellant involved in adultery and fornication etc. Respondent admitted those allegations are at the instigation of her advocate and they are not true.”

    Patna High Court Allows Appeal Beyond Stipulated Time based on CBIC Notification

    Case Title: M/s Prince Sanitation Gandhi Path vs. The State of Bihar and Ors

    LL Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Pat) 155

    In a recent ruling, the Patna High Court has provided relief to individuals facing delayed appeals under Sections 73 and 74 of the BGST Act.

    The judgment, arising from a petition challenging the rejection of an appeal due to a five-day delay, underscores the significance of a recent notification by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

    According to Notification No. 53 of 2023-Central Tax, dated 02.11.2023 (S.O. 4767(E)), the time for filing appeals against orders passed by the Proper Officer on or before 31.03.2023 has been extended.


    Next Story