Top
Top Stories

Breaking: Allahabad HC Orders Removal Of UP Govt Banners Naming Anti-CAA Protesters Accused Of Violence [Read Judgment]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
9 March 2020 8:46 AM GMT
Breaking: Allahabad HC Orders Removal Of UP Govt Banners Naming Anti-CAA Protesters Accused Of Violence [Read Judgment]
x
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

In a severe jolt to Yogi Adityanath-led government of Uttar Pradesh, the Allahahabad High Court on Monday ordered the removal of all posters and banners put up by UP police in Lucknow publishing the names and photos of persons accused of violence during protests against Citizenship Amendment Act.

The Court observed that the State action amounted to "unwarranted interference in privacy of people" and hence violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.

The Court also directed the District Magistrate and Police Commissioner submit compliance report with Registrar General of High Court by March 16.

Taking suo moto cognizance of the news reports of banners and posters in the capital city, a division bench comprising Chief Justice Govind Mathur and Justice Ramesh Sinha decided to hold a special sitting on March 8(Sunday) at 10 AM.

During the hearing on Sunday, the court had orally observed that "good sense should prevail on the State and it should remove the hoardings and apprise the court about this at 3 PM".

The matter was first taken up at 10 AM on Sunday when the bench comprised by Chief Justice Govind Mathur and Justice Ramesh Sinha pulled up state authorities stating that the impugned state action was "highly unjust" and that it was an absolute "encroachment" on personal liberty of the persons concerned.

The matter was the adjourned till 3 PM on Sunday to enable appearance of Advocate General.

At 3 pm, the AG disputed the jurisdiction of the HC stating that the hoardings were put up in Lucknow and therefore the principal seat of the HC did not have any jurisdiction in the matter. He had also submitted that PILs should not be registered to protect those who break the law.

In the judgment passed today, the Court observed :

"In entirety, we are having no doubt that the action of the State which is subject matter of this public interest litigation is nothing but an unwarranted interference in privacy of people. The same hence, is in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India".

Rejecting the opposition put up by the Advocate General to the Court taking suo moto action, the judgment stated :

"where there is gross negligence on part of public authorities and government, where the law is disobeyed and the public is put to suffering and where the precious values of the constitution are subjected to injuries, a constitutional court can very well take notice of that at its own. The Court in such matters is not required to wait necessarily for a person to come before it to ring the bell of justice. The Courts are meant to impart justice and no court can shut its eyes if a public unjust is happening just before it". 

The Court said that the action of publishing names and photos of accused persons violated the tests of legality, legitimate aim and proportionality on the reasonableness of invasion of right to privacy.

It was found that the action had no support of law, as no statute prescribed such a procedure of 'naming and shaming' of accused persons.

Regarding legitimate aim, it was observed 

"we do not find any necessity for a democratic society for a legitimate aim to have publication of personal data and identity. The accused persons are the accused from whom some compensation is to be recovered and in no manner they are fugitive. Learned Advocate General also failed to satisfy us as to why placement of the banners is necessary for a democratic society for a legitimate aim."

With respect to the Advocate General's submission that the action was intended as a deterrence effect, the Court observed :

"learned Advocate General failed to satisfy us as to why the personal data of few persons have been placed on banners though in the State of Uttar Pradesh there are lakhs of accused persons who are facing serious allegations pertaining to commission of crimes whose personal details have not been subjected to publicity. As a matter of fact, the  placement of personal data of selected persons reflects colorable exercise of powers by the Executive"

The Lucknow administration had put up hoardings at major cross-sections in the city, with details of about 60 people who have been issued recovery notices for their alleged involvement in violence during CAA protests on December 19, 2019.

A government spokesman said the posters have been up on the Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's directive at important intersections, including the main crossing in the busy Hazratganj area and in front of the Assembly building.

Noted activist Sadaf Jafar, human rights lawyer Mohammad Shoaib, activist and former IPS officer S R Darapuri etc., also figure in one of the banners.

Click here to download judgment

Read Judgment



Next Story