[CLAT Vs NLAT In SC] "Justifications of Avoiding a 'Zero Year' Can't Trump the "Legitimate Expectations" of Students And Fundamental Rights":Petitioners File Rejoinder
Akshita Saxena
15 Sept 2020 8:47 PM IST
![[CLAT Vs NLAT In SC] Justifications of Avoiding a Zero Year Cant Trump the Legitimate Expectations of Students And Fundamental Rights:Petitioners File Rejoinder [CLAT Vs NLAT In SC] Justifications of Avoiding a Zero Year Cant Trump the Legitimate Expectations of Students And Fundamental Rights:Petitioners File Rejoinder](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2020/09/08/750x450_381140-r-venkata-rao-and-sudhir-krishnaswamy.jpg)
Next Story
15 Sept 2020 8:47 PM IST
Former Vice Chancellor of NLSIU, Prof. (Dr.) R. Venkata Rao has filed a rejoinder affidavit before the Supreme Court, in support of his plea against the University's "unilateral decision" to withdraw from CLAT 2020 and hold a separate entrance examination, namely NLAT. He has submitted that the exam, as conducted on September 12, 2020 with the Top Court's permission (order), is...
Your support helps us to bring you more content at
an affordable subscription scheme !!!
All payment options available
