BREAKING: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS 10% RESERVATIONS FOR ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS (EWS) LIVE UPDATES

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

7 Nov 2022 3:49 AM GMT

  • BREAKING: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS 10% RESERVATIONS FOR ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS (EWS) LIVE UPDATES

    The Supreme Court to pronounce the Judgement TODAY determining the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment which introduced 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in education and public employment came out today. The matter was heard by a 5-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India UU Lalit, Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi and JB...

    The Supreme Court to pronounce the Judgement  TODAY determining the validity of the 103rd Constitutional Amendment which introduced 10% reservation for Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in education and public employment came out today. The matter was heard by a 5-judge bench comprising Chief Justice of India UU Lalit, Justices Dinesh Maheshwari, S Ravindra Bhat, Bela M Trivedi and JB Pardiwala who held hearing for seven days. 

    The petitions challenged the validity of Constitution (103rd) Amendment Act 2019. Economic reservation in jobs and education was proposed to be provided by inserting clause (6) in Articles 15 and 16 of the Constitution through the amendment passed by the Parliament in January 2019. The newly inserted Article 15(6) enabled the State to make special provisions for advancement of any economically weaker section of citizens, including reservations in educational institutions. It states that such reservation can be made in any educational institution, including private institutions, whether aided or unaided, except minority educational institutions covered under Article 30(1). It further states that the upper limit of the reservation will be ten percent, which will be in addition to the existing reservations. After the amendment was notified by the President, a batch of petitions were filed in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of economic reservation.

    CASE TITLE: Janhit Abhiyan v. Union Of India with 32 connected matters | W.P.(C)NO.55/2019 and connected issues

    FOLLOW LIVE UPDATES HERE 

    Live Updates

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:17 AM GMT

      Justice Trivedi : The sum and substance is that limitations imposed, whether procedural or substantive, on Constituent power on the State cannot be said to be disregarded by the Parliament.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:16 AM GMT

      Justice Trivedi : Treating EWS as separate class would be a reasonable classification. Just as equals as unequals, unequals cannot be treated equally. Treating unequals equally violates equality under the Constitution.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:16 AM GMT

      Justice Trivedi : State has come out with amendment for advancement of EWS categories

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:16 AM GMT

      Justice Trivedi : The impugned amendment has to be treated as an affirmative action by the Parliament for the benefit of EWS class. It cannot be said to be unreasonable classification.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:15 AM GMT

      Justice Bela Trivedi concurs with Justice Dinesh Maheshwari. Holds that Constitution 103rd Amendment cannot be struck down as violating basic structure or being discriminatory.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:14 AM GMT

      #BREAKING Justice Dinesh Maheshwari : 103rd Constitution Amendment cannot be said to breaching basic structure for exceeding 50% ceiling limit.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:14 AM GMT

      #BREAKING Justice Dinesh Maheshwari : 103rd Constitution Amendment cannot be said to breaching basic structure for excluding classes covered by 15(4), 16(4) from EWS.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:13 AM GMT

      #BREAKING Justice Dinesh Maheshwari : 103rd Constitution Amendment cannot be said to breaching basic structure by providing reservation on economic criteria.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:12 AM GMT

      Justice Dinesh Maheshwari : Reservations for EWS does not violate basic structure on account of 50% ceiling limit because ceiling limit is not inflexible.

    • 7 Nov 2022 5:12 AM GMT

      #BREAKING Justice Dinesh Maheshwari : Breach of 50% ceiling limit does not violate basic structure.

    Next Story