Grossly Unfair To Report Exact Contents Of Chargesheet Before Cognizance & Providing Copies To Accused : Delhi Court In Riots Conspiracy Case

In a significant order, a Sessions Court in Delhi observed on Tuesday that it is "grossly and unjustified" on the part of the media to report the exact contents of the chargesheet when the Court is yet to take cognizance on it and the accused persons have not been provided its copies.While reporting generally on the chargesheet is acceptable, reproducing the chargesheet as it is gives rise to the issue of 'leakage', the Court observed, expressing its expectation that such instances do not recur.The observations came after certain accused persons including ex JNU student leader Umar Khalid, Asif Iqbal Tanha, Khalid Saifi, Tasleem and Sharjeel Imam raised their grievances that certain media houses were indulging in "media trial" against them by projecting them as convicts and rioters, thereby affecting their right to fair trial. "There is a world of difference between an accused and a convict. Though it is not possible to lay guidelines regarding media coverage, yet in my opinion, there should at least always be a disclaimer while reporting, whether it is the version of the police/prosecution or the accused himself of presenting as it is the order of the Court." Observed Additional Sessions Judge, Amitabh Rawat. During the course of hearing, Umar Khalid, appearing in person before the judge, submitted: "There were newspapers where the pictures of Asif iqbal, Natasha, me, Devangana etc were published with the headline "Dilli dango ke bade gunegaar, ye hain unke chehere". How can we be condemned without given a chance? Without a trial, they are projecting us as dangaayi and rioters." The Court in its order running 8 pages observed thus: "Media reporting particularly on the social media remains charged up all the time. Media is free to cover the stories but they must also be conscious of remaining careful and objective in their approach. It is the fundamental right of every person accused of any offence, to be provided the opportunity to defend himself." The Court went ahead to observe: "Labeling the police as completely unfair or the accused as a convict itself is not a healthy sign and which impacts the process of criminal justice system. The principle and tenets of free and fair trial are sacrosanct and inviolable." "There is also a disturbing trend about the reporting of exact content of the charge sheet before the cognizance is taken or counsels are even provided the copies of the same. It is one thing to report generally about the chargesheet but quite another to reproduce it as it is and thus, obviously the question of leakage would arise. This is grossly unfair and unjustified and the Court expects that this would not occur in future." The order reads. It was submitted by the accused Asif Iqbal Tanha that after the headlines quoting them as "dangaayi" were shown by the media houses, they were subjected to discrimination inside the jail. "I have not been given proper medical treatment. Due to this, we have to go through a lot. We have to hear a lot of things. I had a serious medical issue but I was given only pain killers." Tanha added. Khalid Saifi, founder of the group "United Against Hate", told the judge:"I am unable to understand what are the charges against me. They say I was part of the protest. They are making serious allegations against me as being a terrorist, because of my name. Before coming to court with anything, they go to media. Then things are published and thereafter they come to court. This entire process has to stop".Advocate Adit S Pujari, appearing for the accused, submitted that TV channels and newspapers were carrying reports against the accused quoting from the charge-sheet.Pujari submitted that the leak is happening from the police end. Mentioning a Times Now report, Pujari submitted that the sections of the supplementary charge sheet were leaked in the media. He added that because of such leakages, the accused in the case have to undergo media trials that is against their rights."The supplementary chargesheet is with the police officer and then it comes to court. But it gets leaked with media. When the leak happens from police, it is very important here", he said.The Special Public Prosecutor Amit Prasad denied that police was leaking information. The SPP told the judge that the Delhi High Court is hearing Asif Iqbal Tanha's petition against leakage to media.The SPP further submitted that the accused were also running 'narratives' in some media outlets about the police investigation. In this context, he referred to an article published by 'Newslaundry'.Pujari responded by saying that articles citing the police or accused versions are different from media reports based on selective quotes from prosecution documents which have not yet been shared with the accused.Other directions passed by the CourtThe Court has called for a medical report to be filed by the concerned Jail Superintendent with regards to the health condition of Asif Iqbal Tanha. The said report has to...

Grossly Unfair To Report Exact Contents Of Chargesheet Before Cognizance & Providing Copies To Accused : Delhi Court In Riots Conspiracy Case

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

Grossly Unfair To Report Exact Contents Of Chargesheet Before Cognizance & Providing Copies To Accused : Delhi Court In Riots Conspiracy Case

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers