Issues That Concern The Nation Are Not Taken Up Immediately By Judiciary : Kapil Sibal

Speaking at an online seminar, senior advocate Kapil Sibal raised concerns regarding the 'Independence of Judiciary' and enunciated how it had become a worrying issue for the public at large. While touching upon various aspects of judicial independence, the Former Union Minister began by envisaging the attributes of a Judge as an individual, and the perception regarding his ability to be fair. "A Judge needs to look at balancing claims and equity and rule accordingly. Our expectation when we go to a Judge is that he needs to have that balance." Adding that a judge must have the ability to listen equally to both sides, Sibal said that this was of utmost importance as the procedure of hearing a matter requires that fairness is ensured. "The procedure requires fairness and what fairness means is that the Judge must listen to both sides intently and both sides must be given the opportunity so that there is no procedural unfairness…Another important attribute of an independent and fair Judge is the ability to listen." Moving on, the senior advocate laid emphasis on the perception of integrity of the institution, in order to maintain the trust of people who knock on the Court's doors seeking justice. Asserting that "the entire judicial structure must be perceived to have institutional integrity", Sibal spoke of the public's confidence being shaken due to doubts regarding how cases are decided, especially at the trial Court level. "Many times we find that we don't have the level of confidence in the manner in which cases are decided as we should have", he said. Pressing the need for financial autonomy of Judges, to guarantee integrity, Sibal said, "we find that the Judges who man the Courts have integrity but occasionally there are instances of senior members on the Bench whose conduct is not as expected." Touching upon the long debated issue of appointment of judges next, Sibal iterated that the Collegium system causes friction, because the Chief Justice has complete control over appointments which take place behind closed doors. Candidly revealing that upon elevation to the Top Court, Chief Justices of High Courts come with their set of lobbies, preferences and dislikes, Sibal claimed that nothing was hidden from the Bar. Highlighting another important issue regarding the conduct of senior Judges or higher members of the Judiciary, Sibal referred to the instances of Former CJI Ranjan Gogoi calling a special sitting on a Saturday to hear allegations of sexual harassment levelled against him as well as acts of Gogoi's predecessor, then CJI Dipak Misra, which led to the impeachment motion being moved against him in Rajya Sabha "These are two serious instances of questionable conduct of higher members of the Judiciary, but there are many more instances across the board", alleged Sibal. Speaking elaborately about administrative decisions taken in the Judiciary, the Former Law Minister questioned the manner in which cases involving specific parties were only placed before specific Benches. "Element of discretion in allocation of cases to Benches is not consistent with the rule of law. That is an administrative decision which cannot be challenged. This is a matter of concern", he added. Raising further doubts, which emanate from a lack of transparency, Sibal pointed out instances of Bench shuffling, overlooking elevation of Judges and also alleged that important cases were not being heard in a timely fashion. Giving the example of Justice Muralidhar being transferred from Delhi High Court to Punjab and Haryana High Court, as well as the shuffle in Gujarat High Court, after a Bench made scathing remarks against the administration, Sibal stated that "such instances affect public perception of independence of judiciary". Sibal also alluded to the controversy over Justice Akil Kureshi's appointment (without specifically naming him), to point out further problems regarding perception. With regard to delayed hearings, Sibal alleged that the Top Court had failed to take up cases which ought to have been heard with urgency. Habeas Corpus cases are being delayed, Jammu and Kashmir administration did not submit Orders through which Section 144 was imposed across the erstwhile State, the Demonitization challenge pending since 2016 has not been heard, the issues relating to the COVID-19 pandemic were not immediately looked into and the Court has still not asked the Government to place on record the national plan under the Disaster Management Act, enlisted Sibal, amidst a slew of shortcomings on part of the Judiciary, which lead to a compromise in the perception of the institution's independence. "The issues that concern the nation are not taken up immediately (by the judiciary) as they should be…The higher judiciary gives great credence to what the State says and it is not the liberal court as...

Issues That Concern The Nation Are Not Taken Up Immediately By Judiciary : Kapil Sibal

Nilashish Chaudhary

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nilashish Chaudhary

Issues That Concern The Nation Are Not Taken Up Immediately By Judiciary : Kapil Sibal

Nilashish Chaudhary

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nilashish Chaudhary

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers