Top Stories

SC Issues Notice On Plea For Cross-Verification Of VVPAT Trails In At least 30% Polling Stations

Apoorva Mandhani
7 Jan 2019 10:37 AM GMT
SC Issues Notice On Plea For Cross-Verification Of VVPAT Trails In At least 30% Polling Stations
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

The Supreme Court, on Monday, sought response from Election Commission of India (ECI) on a petition demanding counting and cross verification of Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trails (VVPAT) in at least 30% (randomly chosen) of all polling stations within each Assembly Segment/ Constituency.

The notice was issued by a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul on a petition filed by former civil servant Mr. MG Devasahayam, former IFS officer Mr. Kalarickal Pranchu Fabian and retired bank officer Mr. Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev, through Advocate Prasanna S.

The petition contends that such cross-verification and counting of VVPAT slips is essential in the interest of democratic principles— that elections should be transparent, should be subject to public scrutiny and should be verifiable.

It further challenges as "manifestly arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable" and consequently, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the Centre's decision to confine such cross-verification exercise to a "statistically insignificant number" of only one polling station in each constituency.

The petition also makes reference to a judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in 2013 in Subramanian Swamy v. ECI, wherein it had directed usage of VVPAT machines for all forthcoming elections in a phased manner.

"…implementation of this Hon'ble Court's directions in Swamy and the larger principles of structural due process, transparency, examinability, voter confidence, voter satisfaction require the Election Commission to conduct random cross-verification of EVM counts with VVPAT counts in order to not only detect any technological mischief or malprogramming of EVMS, but also deter such mischief," it submits.

The petition however points out, that while the ECI has been implementing random cross verifications in the recent State elections, the fraction of polling stations chosen for the same has been "inexplicably minuscule", i.e. less than 1% of polling stations in each constituency.

It then asserts, "…a decision to limit the cross-verification to such a minuscule share is manifestly arbitrary, irrational, unreasonable and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution and also an effective violation of democracy principle and the principle of elections not only needing to be free and fair, but also seen to be free and fair.

"The Petitioners submit that in order to detect and deter any such mischief or bias in the EVM process, at least 30% of all polling stations in a constituency must be chosen randomly for EVM counts to be cross verified with VVPAT counts."

The petition goes on to clarify that it is not challenging or delegitimising any election held so far in the country. "However, it is necessary for an advanced democracy such as India to adopt a process that has integrity and inspires confidence, independent on the technological safeguards and a process that acknowledges, accounts for asymmetries in information and the opacity of the electronic voting and makes meaningful use of the VVPATs," it adds.

It then demands mandatory scrutiny of VVPAT trails of at least 30% of all EVMs used in every Constituency in every election henceforth. It further demands a direction to the ECI to make it compulsory for Returning Officers to order hand-counting of all VVPAT slips of polling stations where the margin of victory is very narrow, i.e. less than 3%.

Such hand-counting has also been sought where discrepancy between the machine-counting total and the hand-counting total in respect of the 5% sample EVMs taken together is greater than a maximum threshold of 1%. 

Next Story
Share it