Breaking: Law Commission Recommends Legalisation Of Regulated Gambling And Sports Betting ; Says Complete Ban Not Working [Read Report]

The Law Commission of India, in its 276th report, has recommended legalisation of regulated betting and gambling activities, asserting that a complete ban has not been returning the desired results.The report titled, “Legal Framework: Gambling and Sports Betting including in Cricket in India” states, “Having discussed the pros and cons of legalising regulated gambling and betting activities, it would be apt to say that the arguments in favour of the same far outweigh the arguments alluding to the immorality of these activities……Since it is not possible to prevent these activities completely, effectively regulating them remains the only viable option. Thus, if Parliament or the State Legislatures wish to proceed in this direction, the Commission feels that regulated gambling would ensure detection of fraud and money laundering, etc. Such regulation of gambling would require a three-pronged strategy, reforming the existing gambling (lottery, horse racing) market, regulating illegal gambling and introducing stringent and over- arching regulations.”Supreme Court’s directiveThe report has been formulated in furtherance of a Supreme Court directive issued in the case of Board of Control for Cricket in India v. Cricket Association of Bihar & Ors., wherein the Apex Court had mandated the LCI to study the possibility of legalising betting in India.The Court had then observed, “… the recommendation made by the Committee that betting should be legalised by law, involves the enactment of a Law which is a matter that may be examined by the Law Commission and the Government for such action as it may consider necessary in the facts and circumstances of the case.”The LCI has, however, examined the legality of both, betting and gambling, opining that the two are closely associated with each other.Difficult to curb it The report acknowledges the fact that with the advent of online gambling and the anonymity that it ensures, it has become extremely challenging for countries to monitor or curb these activities. It then highlights the advantages of regulating such activities, claiming that this would not only ensure transparency in the market, but would also strike at the underworld’s control over the illegal and unregulated gambling industry. In addition, the revenue generated by regulating and taxing betting and gambling has been found to be a “good source of revenue” to be “used for public welfare”.The report says, “Regulation would therefore, empower the authorised agencies to identify and prevent instances of gambling by minors and ‘problem-gamblers’ as well as save the public from any kind of inconvenience at the hands of the law enforcement authorities. It would also enable the Government to effectively curb the menace of black-money generation through illegal gambling.”It therefore concludes that while States should completely ban “unlawful” betting and gambling, a complete ban has been counter-productive, resulting in a boom in black-money generation and circulation. Thereafter, recommending its regulation, the report asserts, “The argument that had gambling been regulated in the Mahabharat period, Yudhishtir could not have put his brothers and wife as stakes, perhaps Mahabharat could not have been there, is full of substance.”Dissenting opinionInterestingly, one of the Commission members, Prof. (Dr.) S. Sivakumar did not agree with the majority opinion and has recorded his dissent separately in a note at the end of the report. He opines that the Supreme Court mandate for the Commission was only to ascertain legalisation of betting in cricket, and not sports betting in general.His note says, “The issue of gambling has never been a subject of reference to the Commission. In the past, the law Commission has generally carried out the mandate given to it. The Commission has now been taking any subject of study sou motu and I feel the practice must be continued.”Prof. Sivakumar further asserts that legalising gambling is not suitable for the country, and alleges that there are vested interests favouring such legalisation, for “amassing money clandestinely, by a handful of game operators, thereby pushing the innocent masses to hands of poverty and penury”. “Further, the socio-economic and cultural circumstances of the country are not pragmatic to accept legalised gambling activities, as it is still treated as a social stigma…in order to save the future generation from treading unethical paths, I am of the opinion that no form of gambling can be permitted from the soil of the country,” the note adds.LCI recommendationsParliament has legislative competence to enact law Since online betting and gambling are offered and played over media (telephones, wireless, broadcasting and other like forms of communication) covered under Entry 31 of List I of the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution, the Parliament has the legislative competence to enact a law(s) dealing with the same.Model Law for States The Parliament may also enact a...

Breaking: Law Commission Recommends Legalisation Of Regulated Gambling And Sports Betting ; Says Complete Ban Not Working [Read Report]

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Breaking: Law Commission Recommends Legalisation Of Regulated Gambling And Sports Betting ; Says Complete Ban Not Working [Read Report]

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers