Justice Datta points out that the CBFC Chairperson's order dated January 6, referring the matter to the Revising Committee, was not challenged. When the Division Bench has listed the matter for January 20, then there is no need for the Supreme Court to interfere at this juncture, Justice Datta observes.

Rohatgi submits that the communication from the CBFC received on January 5, saying that the film has been referred to the Revising Committee, was challenged. He says that this communication was the same as the January 6 order of the Chairperson. He says that the writ petition was filed challenging the January 5 order, and pending the challenge, the January 6 order was uploaded. Justice Datta says that the writ petition should have been amended to challenge the January