J Datta: judgment makes a conclusion, where is the discussion

AG: the court goes back to bangalore water supply and says that J Iyer's and others also take note of it.

J Datta: they say the legislature and executive are helpless, what prevented them to enforce the amended act which compelled the five judges?

AG: there is no material available in the judgment

J Datta: is this a valid reference? Bench in para 24 repeatedly said its not a unanimous definition, how is it relevant? it has to be considered as seven judge irrespective of the dissent