Singhvi: another nuance, 2G says you can have different view on law, in c v d case, law my change and same 2G mentions will not change the list. In the present case, it mylords allow advisory, mylords can't give a judgment. That is a and b, tamil nadu, stands as it is, and for rest of country, the law could be c and d. The decision 2G, kaveri, the view can't change.