J Bagchi: enlightened us on this, it holds article 26(b) subject to other provisions of this part but sub-clause 2 does not have this subordinate clause but sub-clause 2 is only an enabling provision. we know the idea of gurudnorm, fundamental right provision had higher prerogative than statutory enactment. if you see clause 2 from that perspective, non-obstante is 'nothing in this article' which is article 25 and not 26. whether a law made in enabling scope of clause 2(b) could not be tested envail on Article 26?