Jaising:lets take the case of FGM-there is an organisation claiming that in exercise of religion, they have power to perform female genital mutilation on girl child of 7 years of age. this is in the name of religion.

why has this court used the word egregious in their judgments? the other side is conceding that this is the limitation. if you claim autonomy, how do you say egregious customs are out

apart from FGM, you have a petition on boycott and another is if a parsi women marries non-parsi, she can't be a part of the funeral process. Mr Subramanium appeared, and when petition was filed, his father was there and J Dipak Misra asked if they will allow the woman to attend her father's funeral-mr subramanium said they will allow.

court said if a women marries a non parsi she loses ther religion. did i lose my religion? i married under special marriage law, my husband is a hindu. Gujarat HC said if parsi woman marries non marriage, she ceases to be parsi due to deemed conversion.