Vaidyanathan- there was a declaration that it is a denominational temple and that came right upto this court and it was decided. in the suit, there was a finding by the trial court that it is public temple affirmed by the first appellate cour that it is a public temple. Mr Nambyar said that this is a matter which I should be allowed to challenge it that it is not a public temple but a private temple. he said that it has already being declared as a denominational temple and it has been affirmed. court said you have not claimed it to be a private temple and therefore, today you cna't be allowed to plea that it is a private temple. There was a contrary situation-one declaration that it was a denominational temple and another that it was private temple.