J Varale: is it taking us to that submission that if I am a believer, I may not be a rationale. If its a long stand practice, accept it and I should follow it without going into all other aspects. It is possible that a believer at some time in earlier years was thinking this way but a believer now with the advance of technology, education, thinking and having exposure to other philosophies, can we say that a believer, if he believes, its okay and fine. You need not to be a rational.

J Bagchi: if you say a religious practice is unique to the denomination, and therefore, anyone who believes and is a part of the denomination,is a believer and naturally will defer to it? If that argument holds, then will you agree that it will be contra to an inner debate in the denomination itself, with regard to what ought to be a religious practice itself? In this situation, what would be the role of the court?