Deepak: [reads the written submission]

J Nagarathna: Shirur mutt was in debt and question was that you require so much money and when you have 1 lac debt, the debt in those days was very high, so when 1 lac in debt and you want to spend so much in paryaha. whether the extent of expenditure was the question and there was an inquiry and all that ultimately they said make a scheme and that scheme was challenged

there was one praticising advocate, he wanted to take control of the mutt because the matapadi was a minor and he was very young. He through his friend got a power of attorney and he started misuing that power of attorney. there was a suit, the power of attorney was terminated...and when there was a suit, all this happened because the advocate there managed to do all that