Sr Adv Neeraj Kishan Kaul: are you talking about blanket excommunication or social or secular groud? para of majority judgment said that it banned escommunication blanketly,

CJI: majority could have applied the segregation, doctrine of reading down could have applied

Kaul: instances are matters of prejudice, factually incorrect. as far as power of Dai, it has been held to be an essential tenet

CJI: the constitution bench with greatest respect failed

Kaul: you can't take a bad instance

CJI: you are right bad instances can't form the basis