Singhvi: as for seelampur, Devanga and Kalita were outsiders but its natural for me to be there because i am the resident. HC deals with it in one sentence- that its distinct- I am ascribed a lesser role.

On rebuttal- only remaining female accused, 5 were there 4 are out. I am in bail in two other FIRs and I satisfy the triple test.

Arguments made against us-gulfisha only mentioned twice in passing. his argument is general not via gulfisha- parity can't be considered, delay I caused, and not simple case of violence but regime change.

2.5.23 order of mylords said that either way, not deciding on facts, but parity is there if one can make out the case. I have given 11 points which make out my case. No specific submission made, only incidently-attended secret meeting in Seelampur [parity with Devangana and Kalita], where chilli power and acid was distributed [same allegation as them] but no recovery and seizure made. Its an open making that you upload it on social media.

second secret meeting in chandbagh where discussion are for inciting-but meeting included 100s including protected witnesses- allegations made by self-serving witnesses who also attended, no words or actions attributed to me.

codewords I used- Aj eid hai, nanital jana hai- I can understand where they are talking about bomb and you find it but what about using codewords?

On chakka jam- it used to be very prominent- when chaudhari charan singh's party was formed, he invented this. but how is this UAPA?

Note two FIRs- 48 and 50-both police station Jaffarabad- no evidence of violence, nothing individuated against me. Its legitimate protest.

Sr Adv Sibal: the video he is talking about, we are fighting a litigation on release of the video of violence. they say, they have not relied upon it.

Singhvi: on FIR 48, they have given video but not for FIR 50.