Raju: arvind kejriwal judgment referred- benefit of parity can't be given when law wrongly applied.

The principle is this, you have file successive applications, you can't file successive bail applications on same facts when material cirsumstances haven't changed.

On question of parity, 15.6.21 HC granted bail to Asif, Natasha, etc-date of order 18.6.21- interim order of SC, 2.5.23 is the final order.

Before that, 18.10.22, HC rejected his bail application- this is after the judgment. [referring to Umar Khalid]. Withdrawal on 14.2.24- after order of SC on 2.5.23, as Supreme Court was not inclined. No change in material circumstances. No question of parity since parity has been considered. On additional grounds, it does not constitute any material change in circumstances.

refers to a judgment-Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav & Anr