Supreme Court, in Hindustan Unilever Ltd. vs. State of Rajasthan, has held that once right is exercised under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 by any of the accused leading to a certificate from the Director of the CFL, the co-accused, who did not exercise that right is also entitled to benefit of its consequence, i.e. supersession of the report given earlier by...
We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok