Inadequate Power Supply And AC Failure In Garib Rath Train, Hyderabad District Commission Orders South-Central Railways Liable For Negligence

Smita Singh

24 Nov 2023 12:12 PM GMT

  • Inadequate Power Supply And AC Failure In Garib Rath Train, Hyderabad District Commission Orders South-Central Railways Liable For Negligence

    The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad (Telangana) bench comprising Sri Vakkanti Narasimha Rao (President) and Smt. D. Sreedevi (Member) held South Central Railway liable for negligence which resulted in great inconvenience (suffocation) to the passengers of AC 3 compartment in the Garib Rath train (12739) going from Vishakhapatnam to Secunderabad....

    The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad (Telangana) bench comprising Sri Vakkanti Narasimha Rao (President) and Smt. D. Sreedevi (Member) held South Central Railway liable for negligence which resulted in great inconvenience (suffocation) to the passengers of AC 3 compartment in the Garib Rath train (12739) going from Vishakhapatnam to Secunderabad. The railway authority was directed to pay a compensation of Rs. 10,000 and pay Rs. 5,000 legal costs.

    Brief Facts:

    KVS Appa Rao and his minor daughter, K. Veekshita (“Complainants”) reserved two seats in the Garib Rath Train (12739) for a journey from Visakhapatnam to Secunderabad on April 5, 2023. According to the complainants, they boarded the train on April 5, 2023, and, after completing their dinner, they attempted to sleep at 22:00 hours. However, they woke up around midnight due to suffocation resulting from the non-functioning of the ACs and fans. Distressed by the situation, the Complainants promptly complained to the Train Ticket Examiner (TTE), highlighting the discomfort caused by the lack of ventilation in the sealed AC 3 compartment. The TTE and other officials allegedly attributed the problem to an electrical failure in the train, assuring that it would be rectified upon reaching Eluru Station. The train reached Eluru station an hour late and the travellers had to suffer difficulties given suffocation from Eluru to Vijayawada station. The train stayed at Vijayawada for 4 hours with no power and water supply. The South-Central Railways also failed to compensate the Complainants.

    Feeling aggrieved, the Complainants filed a consumer complaint in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-II, Hyderabad (“District Commission”). South-central Railways did not make any representation before the Commission or submit a written version. Thus, they were proceeded against ex-parte.

    Observations by the Commission:

    In its decision, the District Commission considered the evidence, including the complainants' letters and the response from the railway authorities. Notably, the railway authorities admitted, in their response to the Complainants, that power supply to AC plants was unavailable due to the non-working of DG sets in the train. The District Commission found that the failure to verify and rectify the issues with the DG sets before the train's departure demonstrated negligence on the part of the railway authorities.

    The District Commission noted that despite the fare charged for the third AC class, the Complainants and other passengers suffered mental agony, physical trauma, and inconvenience due to the non-functioning of essential amenities during the journey. In light of these considerations, the District Commission held that the South-Central Railway was liable for deficiency in service and directed it to pay Rs. 10,000/- as compensation for causing mental agony and physical trauma to the Complainants, along with an additional Rs. 5,000/- towards the costs incurred. The Commission dismissed the remaining claims made by the Complainants and granted the railway authorities 45 days from the date of receipt of the order to give compensation.

    Case Title: KVS Appa Rao and Anr. vs General Manager, South Central Railway

    Case No.: Consumer Case No. 47/2023

    Advocates for the Complainant: P. Santhoshi Kumari

    Advocate for the Respondent: None (Ex-parte)

    Click Here To Read/Download Order

    Next Story