RERA Cases Monthly Digest: September, 2024

Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal MahaREAT Finds MahaRERA's Dismissal Of Homebuyer's Complaint Incorrect, Directs Builder To Refund ₹4.5 Lakh Case – Mr. Jaikishan Udhav Lakhwani & anr Versus M/s. Kanakia Spaces Realty Private Limited Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) bench, comprising Shriram R. Jagtap (Judicial Member) and Dr. K Shivaji (Technical Member), holds Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) dismissal of the homebuyer's complaint incorrect and directed the builder to refund ₹4.5 lakh received for the issuance of No Objection Certificate (NOC) for transfer of the flat to a third party purchaser. MahaREAT Dismisses Homebuyer's Application For Condonation Of 298-Day Delay In Filing Appeal Case - Mr. Hyder Esmailjee Lakdawala & anr Versus Sankalp Developers & Projects Consultant & others Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribunal (Tribunal) Bench, comprising SS Shinde (Chairperson) and Dr. K. Shivaji (Technical Member), has dismissed the homebuyer's application for condonation of a 298-day delay in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The homebuyer appealed the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) order dated October 27, 2021. According to Section 44(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, the homebuyer had 60 days from the date of receiving a copy of the order to file an appeal before the tribunal Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority Karnataka RERA Directs Mantri Developers To Pay 42 Lakh Rupees To Homebuyer As Interest For Delayed Possession Case – Mrs. Shruti Gautam Versus M/S Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed Mantri Developers, the builder, to pay 42.87 lakh rupees to the homebuyer as interest for the delay in handing over possession of the flat. According to the agreement, the builder was supposed to hand over possession by March 2017. Karnataka RERA Holds Shriprop Projects For Delayed Possession Of 2 Years, Orders Interest To Homebuyer Case – Kapil Chandrika Pandey & anr Versus Shriprop Projects Pvt. Ltd Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Neelmani N. Raju (Member), has directed Shriprop Projects Pvt. Ltd, the builder, to pay interest to the homebuyer after the builder handed over possession of the flat with a 2-year delay. According to the terms of the agreement, the builder was supposed to hand over possession by September 2020. Karnataka RERA Orders Mantri Developers To Pay ₹65 Lakh To Homebuyer For 7-Year Delay In Possession Case – Anitha Bakhtani Versus Mantri Developers Pvt. Ltd Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising GR Reddy (Member), has directed Mantri Developers, the builder, to pay Sixty-Five lakh rupees to the homebuyer as interest for 7 Years delay in handing over possession of the flat. According to the agreement, the builder was supposed to hand over possession by March 2015. Himachal Real Estate Regulatory Authority Himachal RERA Directs Ahlawat Developers To Execute Sale Deed In Favor Of Homebuyer Within 2 Months Case – Sita Devi & anr Versus M/s Ahlawat Developer and Promoters Himachal Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority), bench comprising Dr. Srikant Baldi (Chairperson), has directed Ahlawat Developers and Promoters to refund the amount paid by the homebuyer with interest if the builder fails to execute the sale deed in favor of the non-Himachali homebuyer within two months. Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority Complaint Filed After 5 Years From Cause Of Action, Haryana RERA Dismisses Homebuyer's Complaint Against Emaar Case – Mrs. Neeru Bhatia Versus M/s Emaar MGF Land Ltd. While dismissing the homebuyer's complaint filed after a delay of 5 years from the date the cause of action arose, the Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority), bench comprising Ashok Sangwan (Member), held that three years is a reasonable time frame for filing complaint under normal circumstances. Haryana RERA Directs Ninaniya Estates To Pay Interest And Assured Returns To Complainant Case – Gunita Singh V/s Ninaniya Estates Ltd. A/W another Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority) bench, comprising Ashok Sangwan (Member), has directed Ninaniya Estates Ltd, the builder, to pay interest and assured returns to the complainant who had booked a retail shop and was expecting possession by 16.11.2021. Earlier in 2012, the complainant had booked a suite in the builder's project named Prism Executive Suites. However, in 2017, the complainant exchanged the suite for a retail shop in the builder's other project named Prism Portico. Haryana RERA Directs Pareena Infrastructures To Refund Homebuyer's Money, After Deducting 10% As Earnest Money Case – Rajesh Ahuja...

RERA Cases Monthly Digest: September, 2024

Aryan Raj

Tags